Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Ciudad de Mexico using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Conger Oliverio's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Conger Oliverio's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Conger Oliverio's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Conger Oliverio's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:33. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:40 | 08:43 to 05:03 | 56.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:07 | 07:24 to 05:17 | 32.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:33 | 06:55 to 06:22 | 8.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:33 to 04:26 | 1.8% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:54 to 04:48 | 1.5% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:15 to 02:15 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:05 to 02:05 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:43 to 40:43 | 0.0% |
| Conger Oliverio | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:40 | 00:00 | 04:42 +00:58 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:40 | 04:29 +00:04 | 04:42 +00:58 |
| Running 2 | 04:33 | 10:13 | 05:05 -00:32 | 09:11 +01:02 |
| Sled Push | 02:15 | 14:46 | 02:59 -00:44 | 14:16 +00:30 |
| Running 3 | 04:42 | 17:01 | 05:32 -00:50 | 17:15 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 03:59 | 21:43 | 05:05 -01:06 | 22:47 -01:04 |
| Running 4 | 04:58 | 25:42 | 05:32 -00:34 | 27:52 -02:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:24 | 30:40 | 05:35 +01:49 | 33:24 -02:44 |
| Running 5 | 04:57 | 38:04 | 05:42 -00:45 | 38:59 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 04:54 | 43:01 | 04:52 +00:02 | 44:41 -01:40 |
| Running 6 | 05:08 | 47:55 | 05:34 -00:26 | 49:33 -01:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:05 | 53:03 | 02:15 -00:10 | 55:07 -02:04 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 55:08 | 05:33 -00:25 | 57:22 -02:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:43 | 01:00:16 | 05:21 +03:22 | 01:02:55 -02:39 |
| Running 8 | 05:41 | 01:08:59 | 06:12 -00:31 | 01:08:16 +00:43 |
| Wall Balls | 06:55 | 01:14:40 | 06:48 +00:07 | 01:14:28 +00:12 |
| Roxzone | 06:57 | 01:28:22 | 07:06 -00:09 | 01:28:22 |
Oliverio Conger, in the 40-44 age group of the HYROX 2024 Ciudad de Mexico, has shown a commendable performance. Overall, he ranked 225 out of 905 athletes, placing him in the top 24% and in his age group, he secured the 30th rank, among the top 23% of 126 athletes. He finished the race in 01:28:22, a respectable time that demonstrates his competitive spirit.
Oliverio showed a strong inclination towards running, with a total running time of 00:40:43, which was 03:18 faster than the average. He displayed consistent speed throughout the race, which further emphasizes his strength as a runner. However, some pacing issues were observed, particularly in the first running segment, where he started slower than the average.
While Oliverio's overall performance was commendable, there are some segments where improvement is needed. These are:
Moving forward, Oliverio should consider the following race strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mc Garry Patrick | 2023 Köln | 01:27:58 | |
| Harris Marc | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:28:49 | |
| Raikes Aaron | 2024 Sydney | 01:28:43 | |
| Parker Ross | 2022 London | 01:28:31 | |
| Soon Wei Kang | 2024 Singapore | 01:28:23 | |
| Vahle Luis | 2023 Hannover | 01:28:11 | |
| Herrmann Andrew | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:28:40 | |
| Pourcelet Georges | 2023 Paris | 01:28:23 | |
| Piovesan Gianluca | 2024 Turin | 01:27:58 | |
| Finley Cj | 2021 Dallas | 01:27:59 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
