Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cameron Danielle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cameron Danielle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cameron Danielle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cameron Danielle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:15. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:09 | 50:22 to 46:13 | 79.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:54 | 05:39 to 04:45 | 17.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:12 | 05:47 to 05:35 | 3.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:52 to 04:52 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:57 to 05:57 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:08 to 05:08 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:58 to 01:58 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:39 to 03:39 | 0.0% |
| Cameron Danielle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:26 | 00:00 | 05:15 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 05:26 | 05:10 -00:18 | 05:15 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 10:18 | 05:36 +00:14 | 10:25 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 16:08 | 02:49 -00:29 | 16:01 +00:07 |
| Running 3 | 06:13 | 18:28 | 05:52 +00:21 | 18:50 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 05:47 | 24:41 | 05:57 -00:10 | 24:42 -00:01 |
| Running 4 | 06:30 | 30:28 | 05:55 +00:35 | 30:39 -00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:57 | 36:58 | 06:26 -00:29 | 36:34 +00:24 |
| Running 5 | 06:33 | 42:55 | 06:05 +00:28 | 43:00 -00:05 |
| Rowing | 05:08 | 49:28 | 05:27 -00:19 | 49:05 +00:23 |
| Running 6 | 06:30 | 54:36 | 05:57 +00:33 | 54:32 +00:04 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:58 | 01:01:06 | 02:18 -00:20 | 01:00:29 +00:37 |
| Running 7 | 06:24 | 01:03:04 | 05:55 +00:29 | 01:02:47 +00:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:39 | 01:09:28 | 04:59 +00:40 | 01:08:42 +00:46 |
| Running 8 | 06:58 | 01:15:07 | 06:26 +00:32 | 01:13:41 +01:26 |
| Wall Balls | 03:39 | 01:22:05 | 05:14 -01:35 | 01:20:07 +01:58 |
| Roxzone | 06:58 | 01:32:35 | 07:14 -00:16 | 01:32:35 |
Danielle Cameron's performance in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox race demonstrated significant strengths, particularly in strength-oriented exercises such as the Ski Erg, Sled Push, Rowing, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls, where she performed considerably faster than the average, placing her in the top 20% for these segments. Her overall rank of 355 out of 1801 places her in the top 19%, indicating a strong overall performance. However, her total running time was 2:39 slower than the average, suggesting a gap in running efficiency. The pattern of her running splits indicates that she tended to start slower and continued to lose time as the race progressed, which may suggest fatigue or pacing issues. Given her slower overall running time, it would be beneficial for her to focus on improving her running to balance her hybrid athlete profile.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kelly Ciara | 2024 Dublin | 01:32:09 | |
| Whittle Gabrielle | 2024 Brisbane | 01:32:56 | |
| Stikvoort Fleur | 2024 Maastricht | 01:32:34 | |
| Alcindor Sabrina | 2024 Marseille | 01:32:09 | |
| Tamez Maria | 2023 Dallas | 01:32:10 | |
| Martinez Martínez Eva | 2022 Valencia | 01:32:40 | |
| López Sánchez Alma | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:32:05 | |
| Richards Julia | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:09 | |
| Larem AnnaMaria | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:31 | |
| Hall Claire | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
