Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Van Gils ErnstJan's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Van Gils ErnstJan's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Van Gils ErnstJan's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Gils ErnstJan's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:15 | 05:54 to 04:39 | 40.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 05:01 to 04:33 | 15.1% |
| Rowing | 00:27 | 05:06 to 04:39 | 14.6% |
| Run Total | 00:27 | 40:35 to 40:08 | 14.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:10 | 04:32 to 04:22 | 5.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:26 to 04:18 | 4.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:05 | 02:38 to 02:33 | 2.7% |
| Wall Balls | 00:05 | 05:45 to 05:40 | 2.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:43 to 01:43 | 0.0% |
| Van Gils ErnstJan | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:28 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 03:28 | 04:23 +00:03 | 04:29 -01:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:58 | 07:54 | 04:49 +00:09 | 08:52 -00:58 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 12:52 | 02:48 -00:10 | 13:41 -00:49 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 15:30 | 05:13 -00:07 | 16:29 -00:59 |
| Sled Pull | 04:32 | 20:36 | 04:43 -00:11 | 21:42 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:13 | 25:08 | 05:11 +00:02 | 26:25 -01:17 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:54 | 30:21 | 05:00 +00:54 | 31:36 -01:15 |
| Running 5 | 05:10 | 36:15 | 05:21 -00:11 | 36:36 -00:21 |
| Rowing | 05:06 | 41:25 | 04:44 +00:22 | 41:57 -00:32 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 46:31 | 05:14 +00:01 | 46:41 -00:10 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:43 | 51:46 | 02:08 -00:25 | 51:55 -00:09 |
| Running 7 | 05:26 | 53:29 | 05:12 +00:14 | 54:03 -00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:01 | 58:55 | 04:52 +00:09 | 59:15 -00:20 |
| Running 8 | 06:03 | 01:03:56 | 05:43 +00:20 | 01:04:07 -00:11 |
| Wall Balls | 05:45 | 01:09:59 | 06:12 -00:27 | 01:09:50 +00:09 |
| Roxzone | 06:47 | 01:22:24 | 06:22 +00:25 | 01:22:24 |
ErnstJan Van Gils delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, ranking in the top 27% overall and in the top 17% within his age group. His overall time of 01:22:24 reflects a strong showing, particularly given his age category. Notably, ErnstJan's total running time was 00:40:35, which is 00:58 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. The best running lap of 00:04:58 further underscores his running capability. However, a deeper look at the pacing strategy reveals that ErnstJan started aggressively with the first running segment being significantly faster than average, but the subsequent running segments showed a gradual slowdown, indicating a need for better pacing management.
By focusing on these strategies and targeted training for the identified segments, ErnstJan Van Gils can enhance his performance in future Hyrox events, leveraging his strong running capabilities while improving on the strength and transition segments.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Daumann Ole | 2019 Nürnberg | 01:22:29 | |
| Brook Edward | 2024 New York | 01:22:24 | |
| Zambelli Gianluca | 2024 Rimini | 01:22:16 | |
| Bartusch Jörn | 2022 Berlin | 01:22:45 | |
| Hendriks Bram | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:17 | |
| Davanzo Matteo | 2024 Rimini | 01:22:17 | |
| Kern Tino | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:30 | |
| Van Der Zanden Rick | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:53 | |
| Russell Marc | 2023 Glasgow | 01:21:59 | |
| Abols Kevin | 2022 London | 01:22:01 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:50 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
