Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:59. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 06:35 to 05:14 | 33.9% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:14 | 06:15 to 05:01 | 31.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:37 | 06:56 to 06:19 | 15.5% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:09 to 04:47 | 9.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 04:41 to 04:26 | 6.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:14 to 02:07 | 2.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:03 | 02:52 to 02:49 | 1.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 41:49 to 41:49 | 0.0% |
| Ruiz Ortega Jose Luis | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:09 | 00:00 | 04:41 -00:32 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:09 | 04:29 +00:12 | 04:41 -00:32 |
| Running 2 | 04:50 | 08:50 | 05:03 -00:13 | 09:10 -00:20 |
| Sled Push | 02:52 | 13:40 | 02:59 -00:07 | 14:13 -00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:19 | 16:32 | 05:31 -00:12 | 17:12 -00:40 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 21:51 | 05:04 -00:23 | 22:43 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 26:32 | 05:29 -00:24 | 27:47 -01:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:35 | 31:37 | 05:32 +01:03 | 33:16 -01:39 |
| Running 5 | 05:21 | 38:12 | 05:40 -00:19 | 38:48 -00:36 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 43:33 | 04:52 +00:17 | 44:28 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 48:42 | 05:31 -00:04 | 49:20 -00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:14 | 54:09 | 02:14 +00:00 | 54:51 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 56:23 | 05:30 -00:17 | 57:05 -00:42 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:15 | 01:01:36 | 05:16 +00:59 | 01:02:35 -00:59 |
| Running 8 | 06:30 | 01:07:51 | 06:09 +00:21 | 01:07:51 +00:00 |
| Wall Balls | 06:56 | 01:14:21 | 06:45 +00:11 | 01:14:00 +00:21 |
| Roxzone | 06:41 | 01:27:49 | 07:04 -00:23 | 01:27:49 |
In terms of pacing, Jose had a strong start with a faster running lap time of 00:04:09, which was 21 seconds faster than the average. He maintained his pace well during the race, with several segments where he performed faster than the average time. This indicates that he has good endurance and consistency throughout the race.
Overall, Jose demonstrated strength and consistency in his performance, particularly in the running segments. By focusing on the areas of improvement mentioned above and implementing the suggested training strategies, he can further enhance his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Grootscholten Jake | 2023 Hamburg | 01:27:58 | |
| Fulton Darren | 2024 Dublin | 01:27:58 | |
| Biedermann Johannes | 2022 München | 01:28:09 | |
| Czichon Mateusz | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:27:30 | |
| Gee Charlie | 2023 London | 01:28:05 | |
| Hanlon Daniel | 2023 London | 01:27:32 | |
| Bons Brend | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:27:28 | |
| Proudfoot Darren | 2024 Birmingham | 01:27:31 | |
| Achtel Christian | 2023 Karlsruhe | 01:27:22 | |
| O Reilly Patrick | 2024 Dublin | 01:28:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Madrid | 01:29:06 | |
| 2022 Madrid | 01:27:10 | |
| 2024 Madrid | 01:29:58 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
