Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kelly Adrian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kelly Adrian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kelly Adrian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kelly Adrian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:14. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:45 | 50:37 to 45:52 | 90.8% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:41 to 02:20 | 6.7% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:08 | 05:46 to 05:38 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:33 to 04:33 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:00 to 02:00 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:06 to 05:06 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:16 to 06:16 | 0.0% |
| Kelly Adrian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:17 | 00:00 | 04:58 +00:19 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:33 | 05:17 | 04:35 -00:02 | 04:58 +00:19 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 09:50 | 05:24 -00:15 | 09:33 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 02:00 | 14:59 | 03:12 -01:12 | 14:57 +00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:26 | 16:59 | 05:50 -00:24 | 18:09 -01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 04:30 | 22:25 | 05:31 -01:01 | 23:59 -01:34 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 26:55 | 05:51 -00:01 | 29:30 -02:35 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:06 | 32:45 | 06:15 -01:09 | 35:21 -02:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:23 | 37:51 | 06:05 +00:18 | 41:36 -03:45 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 44:14 | 05:02 -00:16 | 47:41 -03:27 |
| Running 6 | 08:04 | 49:00 | 05:54 +02:10 | 52:43 -03:43 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:41 | 57:04 | 02:25 +00:16 | 58:37 -01:33 |
| Running 7 | 07:04 | 59:45 | 05:53 +01:11 | 01:01:02 -01:17 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 01:06:49 | 05:52 -00:06 | 01:06:55 -00:06 |
| Running 8 | 07:28 | 01:12:35 | 06:49 +00:39 | 01:12:47 -00:12 |
| Wall Balls | 06:16 | 01:20:03 | 07:32 -01:16 | 01:19:36 +00:27 |
| Roxzone | 09:03 | 01:35:13 | 08:05 +00:58 | 01:35:13 |
Adrian Kelly delivered a commendable performance in the 2024 Melbourne HYROX race, ranking in the top 45% of all participants and top 49% in his age group. His overall time was 01:35:13, showcasing a balanced effort across the event. While his strength-based exercises were mostly above average, his total running time was 03:30 slower than the average, indicating an area for improvement. Adrian's pacing strategy appeared to be conservative at the start, with some strong running laps initially, but he lost momentum in the latter stages, particularly in Running 6 and 7. This suggests a potential need for improved endurance and pacing throughout the race. Adrian shows a hybrid profile with commendable strength but needs to enhance his running capabilities to reach optimal performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Schiewe Jochen | 2022 München | 01:34:56 | |
| Santacroce Andrea | 2023 London | 01:35:23 | |
| Haase Frank | 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:34:54 | |
| Leavitt Chandler | 2023 Los Angeles | 01:34:56 | |
| Sutera Remi | 2024 Marseille | 01:34:44 | |
| Nikopoulos Konstantinos | 2023 London | 01:35:19 | |
| Chakroun Mahmoud | 2024 Paris | 01:35:05 | |
| Warren Mike | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:43 | |
| Riley Richard | 2024 New York | 01:35:37 | |
| Thomas Ashley | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:54 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
