Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Duffy James's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Duffy James's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Duffy James's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Duffy James's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:36 | 50:04 to 44:28 | 64.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:18 | 06:58 to 05:40 | 15.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:58 | 03:58 to 03:00 | 11.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:34 | 02:48 to 02:14 | 6.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 05:36 to 05:21 | 2.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:09 to 04:09 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:44 to 03:44 | 0.0% |
| Duffy James | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:36 | 00:00 | 04:49 +00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:11 | 05:36 | 04:33 -00:22 | 04:49 +00:47 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 09:47 | 05:18 +00:13 | 09:22 +00:25 |
| Sled Push | 03:58 | 15:18 | 03:08 +00:50 | 14:40 +00:38 |
| Running 3 | 06:38 | 19:16 | 05:46 +00:52 | 17:48 +01:28 |
| Sled Pull | 04:09 | 25:54 | 05:23 -01:14 | 23:34 +02:20 |
| Running 4 | 06:42 | 30:03 | 05:45 +00:57 | 28:57 +01:06 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:58 | 36:45 | 05:58 +01:00 | 34:42 +02:03 |
| Running 5 | 06:29 | 43:43 | 05:57 +00:32 | 40:40 +03:03 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 50:12 | 04:58 -00:15 | 46:37 +03:35 |
| Running 6 | 06:05 | 54:55 | 05:48 +00:17 | 51:35 +03:20 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:48 | 01:01:00 | 02:21 +00:27 | 57:23 +03:37 |
| Running 7 | 06:05 | 01:03:48 | 05:45 +00:20 | 59:44 +04:04 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:36 | 01:09:53 | 05:35 +00:01 | 01:05:29 +04:24 |
| Running 8 | 07:03 | 01:15:29 | 06:33 +00:30 | 01:11:04 +04:25 |
| Wall Balls | 03:44 | 01:22:32 | 07:14 -03:30 | 01:17:37 +04:55 |
| Roxzone | 06:26 | 01:32:33 | 07:42 -01:16 | 01:32:33 |
Based on the splits analysis, James showed strength in the Ski Erg and Sled Pull segments, where he performed faster than the average. However, he struggled in the Running 1, Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8, Sled Push, Farmers Carry, and Roxzone segments, where he lost time compared to the average.
In conclusion, James Duffy showed a strong performance in the Hyrox race in Los Angeles, but there are areas where he can improve. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as interval training, strength training, and mental preparation, James can enhance his performance in the identified segments and overall race.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Sims Phil | 2022 London | 01:32:22 | |
| Kowalczyk Laurent | 2023 Köln | 01:32:36 | |
| Huizer Martijn | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:32:42 | |
| Franke Kai | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:55 | |
| Diaz Carlos | 2023 Malmö | 01:33:01 | |
| Bevan Gregory | 2023 Birmingham | 01:32:29 | |
| Ochel Tim | 2024 Hamburg | 01:32:33 | |
| Cutillas David | 2024 Madrid | 01:32:07 | |
| Hillyard Jake | 2024 London | 01:32:09 | |
| Stekly Dom | 2024 Singapore | 01:32:41 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Anaheim | 01:27:42 | |
| 2023 Los Angeles | 01:27:37 | |
| 2024 Anaheim | 01:35:25 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
