Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of Van Der Klooster Renda's race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where Van Der Klooster Renda hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare Van Der Klooster Renda’s performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Van Der Klooster Renda's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:50 | 45:00 to 43:10 | 42.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:26 | 06:44 to 05:18 | 33.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:22 | 04:39 to 04:17 | 8.5% |
| Wall Balls | 00:17 | 04:22 to 04:05 | 6.6% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:21 to 05:10 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 05:03 to 04:55 | 3.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:06 to 02:01 | 1.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:38 to 04:38 | 0.0% |
| Van Der Klooster Renda | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 08:06 | 00:00 | 04:56 +03:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:03 | 08:06 | 05:01 +00:02 | 04:56 +03:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 13:09 | 05:18 -00:09 | 09:57 +03:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:22 | 18:18 | 02:35 -00:13 | 15:15 +03:03 |
| Running 3 | 05:06 | 20:40 | 05:34 -00:28 | 17:50 +02:50 |
| Sled Pull | 04:38 | 25:46 | 05:28 -00:50 | 23:24 +02:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:05 | 30:24 | 05:36 -00:31 | 28:52 +01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:44 | 35:29 | 05:42 +01:02 | 34:28 +01:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:24 | 42:13 | 05:44 -00:20 | 40:10 +02:03 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 47:37 | 05:17 +00:04 | 45:54 +01:43 |
| Running 6 | 05:11 | 52:58 | 05:38 -00:27 | 51:11 +01:47 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:06 | 58:09 | 02:11 -00:05 | 56:49 +01:20 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 01:00:15 | 05:37 -00:22 | 59:00 +01:15 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 01:05:30 | 04:28 +00:11 | 01:04:37 +00:53 |
| Running 8 | 05:47 | 01:10:09 | 05:58 -00:11 | 01:09:05 +01:04 |
| Wall Balls | 04:22 | 01:15:56 | 04:39 -00:17 | 01:15:03 +00:53 |
| Roxzone | 05:55 | 01:26:04 | 06:22 -00:27 | 01:26:04 |
One area of improvement for Renda is her pacing. She started off slower in Running 1, and although she picked up the pace in subsequent running segments, she could benefit from more consistent pacing throughout the race. Additionally, her Burpees Broad Jump segment was slower than average, indicating a potential area for improvement.
Renda's profile leans more towards running, as indicated by her Total running time being slower than average. To enhance her performance, she should focus on improving her overall fitness and transition time in the roxzone. This can be achieved through specific training techniques and exercises tailored to enhance her endurance and agility.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Deas Ellissah | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:43 | |
| Gee Mellissa | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:59 | |
| Stelling Nena | 2024 Hamburg | 01:26:13 | |
| Taghavie Szentpaly Tamara | 2024 Madrid | 01:26:18 | |
| Sommer Laura | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:26:17 | |
| Salomon Laura | 2023 Madrid | 01:25:41 | |
| Komp Alina | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:26:24 | |
| Clarke Samantha | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:03 | |
| Levitan Sophie | 2022 London | 01:26:04 | |
| Garbani Nina | 2024 Stockholm | 01:26:30 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:45 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:33:39 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:26:09 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
