Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 893 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Sorrell Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Sorrell Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Sorrell Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Sorrell Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:34. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:18 | 12:23 to 07:05 | 50.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:42 | 11:15 to 06:33 | 44.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:28 | 06:43 to 06:15 | 4.4% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 05:21 to 05:15 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:13 to 02:13 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:02 to 02:02 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:28 to 05:28 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:36 to 46:36 | 0.0% |
| Sorrell Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:05 | 00:00 | 05:20 -00:15 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 05:05 | 04:46 -00:09 | 05:20 -00:15 |
| Running 2 | 05:04 | 09:42 | 05:56 -00:52 | 10:06 -00:24 |
| Sled Push | 02:13 | 14:46 | 03:37 -01:24 | 16:02 -01:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:23 | 16:59 | 06:34 -01:11 | 19:39 -02:40 |
| Sled Pull | 06:43 | 22:22 | 06:19 +00:24 | 26:13 -03:51 |
| Running 4 | 05:49 | 29:05 | 06:33 -00:44 | 32:32 -03:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 12:23 | 34:54 | 07:14 +05:09 | 39:05 -04:11 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 47:17 | 06:53 -00:22 | 46:19 +00:58 |
| Rowing | 05:21 | 53:48 | 05:16 +00:05 | 53:12 +00:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:56 | 59:09 | 06:37 -00:41 | 58:28 +00:41 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:02 | 01:05:05 | 02:41 -00:39 | 01:05:05 +00:00 |
| Running 7 | 05:52 | 01:07:07 | 06:34 -00:42 | 01:07:46 -00:39 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 11:15 | 01:12:59 | 06:44 +04:31 | 01:14:20 -01:21 |
| Running 8 | 07:00 | 01:24:14 | 07:53 -00:53 | 01:21:04 +03:10 |
| Wall Balls | 05:28 | 01:31:14 | 08:54 -03:26 | 01:28:57 +02:17 |
| Roxzone | 10:46 | 01:47:19 | 09:28 +01:18 | 01:47:19 |
Mark Sorrell competed in the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event with commendable performance, finishing in the top 55% overall. His most notable strengths were in the running segments, particularly highlighted by his total running time of 46:36, which was 5:52 faster than the average, indicating a strong runner profile. Despite this strength, Mark's performance in strength-based exercises, such as the Burpees Broad Jump and Sandbag Lunges, requires improvement. His running pace was consistent and faster than average but might have been slightly too aggressive in the initial segments. This suggests a need to balance between maintaining early speed and sustaining energy for later strength exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hödl Peter | 2022 München | 01:47:21 | |
| Carland Luke | 2024 Melbourne | 01:47:45 | |
| Carden Joe | 2024 Birmingham | 01:47:47 | |
| Wilson John | 2023 Glasgow | 01:47:43 | |
| Lee Sean | 2023 Singapore | 01:47:15 | |
| Haid Michael | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:46:57 | |
| Heiss Matthew | 2023 Anaheim | 01:47:07 | |
| Chunyayev Pavel | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:47:15 | |
| Almeida Gui | 2024 Birmingham | 01:47:38 | |
| Inglis Gary | 2023 Dublin | 01:47:22 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
