Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:03. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:43 (From 43:22 to 41:39) | 83.7% |
| BBJ | 00:14 (From 05:14 to 05:00) | 11.4% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 (From 04:43 to 04:39) | 3.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:02 (From 06:05 to 06:03) | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:03 to 04:03) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 02:33 to 02:33) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 04:31 to 04:31) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 01:55 to 01:55) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:39 to 04:39) | 0.0% |
| Moses Lee | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:48 | 00:00 | 04:36 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:03 | 03:48 | 04:27 -00:24 | 04:36 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:09 | 07:51 | 04:57 +00:12 | 09:03 -01:12 |
| Sled Push | 02:33 | 13:00 | 02:55 -00:22 | 14:00 -01:00 |
| Running 3 | 05:36 | 15:33 | 05:23 +00:13 | 16:55 -01:22 |
| Sled Pull | 04:43 | 21:09 | 04:58 -00:15 | 22:18 -01:09 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 25:52 | 05:22 +00:19 | 27:16 -01:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:14 | 31:33 | 05:19 -00:05 | 32:38 -01:05 |
| Running 5 | 05:45 | 36:47 | 05:32 +00:13 | 37:57 -01:10 |
| Rowing | 04:31 | 42:32 | 04:49 -00:18 | 43:29 -00:57 |
| Running 6 | 05:43 | 47:03 | 05:24 +00:19 | 48:18 -01:15 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:55 | 52:46 | 02:11 -00:16 | 53:42 -00:56 |
| Running 7 | 05:45 | 54:41 | 05:22 +00:23 | 55:53 -01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:39 | 01:00:26 | 05:07 -00:28 | 01:01:15 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 05:57 | 01:05:05 | 05:59 -00:02 | 01:06:22 -01:17 |
| Wall Balls | 06:05 | 01:11:02 | 06:30 -00:25 | 01:12:21 -01:19 |
| Roxzone | 08:46 | 01:25:45 | 06:54 +01:52 | 01:25:45 |
Lee Moses delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event. Securing an overall rank of 365, he placed in the top 25% of 1404 athletes, and within his age group (25-29), he ranked 69th, marking him in the top 29% of 234 athletes.
His total running time was 43:22 minutes, which is 28 seconds slower than the average. This suggests that Lee is more strength-oriented, as witnessed in his performance in segments like Ski Erg and Sled Push, where he outperformed the average times. His best running lap was 5:09 minutes.
However, it is worth noting that Lee seemed to lose some momentum in the later stages of the race, with his times on Running 6 and Running 7 being slower than the average. This could be an indication of a lack of endurance or a pacing strategy that needs to be reevaluated.
For future races, Lee should consider implementing the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Durantpritchard Tom | 2023 London | 01:25:55 | |
| Ehlers Oliver | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:25:44 | |
| Willis Jake | 2023 London | 01:25:16 | |
| D'Assaro Andrea Giulio | 2024 Milan | 01:26:11 | |
| Stok Edwin | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:52 | |
| Hardman Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:07 | |
| Bianchi Stefano | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:25:56 | |
| Konings Koen | 2024 Maastricht | 01:25:41 | |
| Arends Joost | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:25:57 | |
| Gates Cheyne | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:26 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 New York Moses Lee, Hersom Justin | 01:15:22 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Moses Lee
