Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kuijpers John's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kuijpers John's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kuijpers John's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kuijpers John's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 18:10. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 14:25 | 59:52 to 45:27 | 79.4% |
| Wall Balls | 02:39 | 09:44 to 07:05 | 14.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 05:49 to 05:19 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 03:26 to 03:07 | 1.7% |
| Rowing | 00:17 | 05:14 to 04:57 | 1.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:31 to 04:31 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:01 to 04:01 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:01 to 02:01 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Kuijpers John | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:19 | 00:00 | 04:56 -00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 04:19 | 04:34 -00:03 | 04:56 -00:37 |
| Running 2 | 04:44 | 08:50 | 05:22 -00:38 | 09:30 -00:40 |
| Sled Push | 03:26 | 13:34 | 03:11 +00:15 | 14:52 -01:18 |
| Running 3 | 03:36 | 17:00 | 05:53 -02:17 | 18:03 -01:03 |
| Sled Pull | 05:49 | 20:36 | 05:31 +00:18 | 23:56 -03:20 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 26:25 | 05:52 -00:28 | 29:27 -03:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:01 | 31:49 | 06:09 -02:08 | 35:19 -03:30 |
| Running 5 | 05:40 | 35:50 | 06:04 -00:24 | 41:28 -05:38 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 41:30 | 05:00 +00:14 | 47:32 -06:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:27 | 46:44 | 05:53 -00:26 | 52:32 -05:48 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 52:11 | 02:24 -00:23 | 58:25 -06:14 |
| Running 7 | 13:43 | 54:12 | 05:52 +07:51 | 01:00:49 -06:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:09 | 01:07:55 | 05:45 -00:36 | 01:06:41 +01:14 |
| Running 8 | 07:03 | 01:13:04 | 06:42 +00:21 | 01:12:26 +00:38 |
| Wall Balls | 09:44 | 01:20:07 | 07:26 +02:18 | 01:19:08 +00:59 |
| Roxzone | 04:51 | 01:34:33 | 07:59 -03:08 | 01:34:33 |
Based on the splits analysis, John performed well in several segments, including Running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Push, Running 3, Sled Pull, Running 4, Burpees Broad Jump, Running 5, Running 6, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Roxzone. He was faster than the average time in these segments, which indicates areas of strength for him.
However, there were segments where John lost time compared to the average. These segments include Running 7, Wall Balls, Rowing, and Running 8. These segments require improvement to enhance overall performance.
By implementing these strategies and incorporating the suggested training techniques and exercises, John can enhance his performance in the identified areas of improvement and continue to excel in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moxley Daniel | 2024 London | 01:34:54 | |
| Eijck Victor | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:34:27 | |
| Dankwah Yaw | 2021 London | 01:34:54 | |
| Mendes Victor | 2024 Bilbao | 01:35:03 | |
| Kirwan Peter | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:47 | |
| Sloyan Matthew | 2024 Melbourne | 01:34:36 | |
| Louw Jordi | 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:46 | |
| Visser Remco | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:34:42 | |
| Valentukonis Povilas | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:34:08 | |
| Hodgson Lee | 2024 Glasgow | 01:34:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:04 | |
| 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:32:48 | |
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:41:27 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:29:03 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:30 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:28:47 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:31:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
