Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kalse Nick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kalse Nick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kalse Nick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kalse Nick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:07. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:17 | 44:06 to 40:49 | 64.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:53 | 05:41 to 04:48 | 17.3% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:28 | 05:08 to 04:40 | 9.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:27 | 04:47 to 04:20 | 8.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:02 | 02:39 to 02:37 | 0.7% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:48 to 03:48 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:27 to 05:27 | 0.0% |
| Kalse Nick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:58 | 00:00 | 04:32 +01:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:47 | 05:58 | 04:24 +00:23 | 04:32 +01:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:17 | 10:45 | 04:52 +00:25 | 08:56 +01:49 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 16:02 | 02:51 -00:12 | 13:48 +02:14 |
| Running 3 | 05:17 | 18:41 | 05:17 +00:00 | 16:39 +02:02 |
| Sled Pull | 03:48 | 23:58 | 04:48 -01:00 | 21:56 +02:02 |
| Running 4 | 05:12 | 27:46 | 05:15 -00:03 | 26:44 +01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:41 | 32:58 | 05:06 +00:35 | 31:59 +00:59 |
| Running 5 | 05:30 | 38:39 | 05:25 +00:05 | 37:05 +01:34 |
| Rowing | 04:41 | 44:09 | 04:46 -00:05 | 42:30 +01:39 |
| Running 6 | 05:15 | 48:50 | 05:17 -00:02 | 47:16 +01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 54:05 | 02:08 -00:20 | 52:33 +01:32 |
| Running 7 | 05:14 | 55:53 | 05:17 -00:03 | 54:41 +01:12 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 01:01:07 | 04:56 +00:12 | 59:58 +01:09 |
| Running 8 | 06:27 | 01:06:15 | 05:50 +00:37 | 01:04:54 +01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 05:27 | 01:12:42 | 06:16 -00:49 | 01:10:44 +01:58 |
| Roxzone | 05:39 | 01:23:39 | 06:39 -01:00 | 01:23:39 |
Pacing and Profile:
Nick's total running time of 00:44:06 is 03:29 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus more on improving his overall fitness and transition time. He should work on increasing his endurance and speed to reduce the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his total running time is slower than average, suggesting that he may benefit from incorporating more running-specific training into his routine.
In conclusion, Nick Kalse had a solid performance in the HYROX race, but there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, running speed, and specific segments where he lost the most time, Nick can further excel in future races. Implementing the suggested training strategies, exercises, and race strategies will help him achieve his goals and improve his performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cahill Declan | 2022 London | 01:23:38 | |
| Feigel Johannes | 2018 Hamburg | 01:23:09 | |
| Coy Eric | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:23:54 | |
| Dibben Mark | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:15 | |
| Sylvain Rousset | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:43 | |
| Kruse Matthias | 2022 Basel | 01:23:38 | |
| Loreto Matthew | 2023 Chicago | 01:23:12 | |
| Pimentinha Diogo | 2023 Malaga | 01:23:24 | |
| Fisher Nick | 2023 Barcelona | 01:23:53 | |
| Ryan Stephen | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:23:16 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:22:52 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:13 | |
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:46:33 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
