Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Maastricht using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Brunt Noa's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Brunt Noa's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Brunt Noa's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Brunt Noa's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:55. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:20 | 08:24 to 06:04 | 59.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:20 | 06:05 to 04:45 | 34.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:15 | 05:20 to 05:05 | 6.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:14 to 02:14 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:57 to 04:57 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 46:07 to 46:07 | 0.0% |
| Brunt Noa | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:50 | 00:00 | 05:13 +00:37 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:20 | 05:50 | 05:10 +00:10 | 05:13 +00:37 |
| Running 2 | 05:25 | 11:10 | 05:35 -00:10 | 10:23 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:14 | 16:35 | 02:49 -00:35 | 15:58 +00:37 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 18:49 | 05:51 -00:27 | 18:47 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 04:14 | 24:13 | 05:58 -01:44 | 24:38 -00:25 |
| Running 4 | 05:52 | 28:27 | 05:54 -00:02 | 30:36 -02:09 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:24 | 34:19 | 06:25 +01:59 | 36:30 -02:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 42:43 | 06:04 -00:21 | 42:55 -00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 48:26 | 05:27 -00:30 | 48:59 -00:33 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 53:23 | 05:56 -00:31 | 54:26 -01:03 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 58:48 | 02:19 -00:09 | 01:00:22 -01:34 |
| Running 7 | 05:25 | 01:00:58 | 05:55 -00:30 | 01:02:41 -01:43 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:05 | 01:06:23 | 04:59 +01:06 | 01:08:36 -02:13 |
| Running 8 | 07:06 | 01:12:28 | 06:24 +00:42 | 01:13:35 -01:07 |
| Wall Balls | 04:44 | 01:19:34 | 05:14 -00:30 | 01:19:59 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 08:12 | 01:32:23 | 07:10 +01:02 | 01:32:23 |
Noa's total race time was 01:32:23, with a total running time of 00:46:07. Her total running time was 27 seconds slower than the average for her finish time. This suggests that Noa could benefit from improving her overall fitness and transition time in order to decrease her roxzone time.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on the identified areas for improvement, Noa can enhance her overall race performance and achieve better results in future Hyrox races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hautala Hilla | 2024 Stockholm | 01:32:12 | |
| Coates Leigh | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:31:58 | |
| Murphy Simone | 2023 London | 01:32:35 | |
| Harlow Jasmine | 2023 London | 01:32:25 | |
| Myburgh Madeleine | 2024 Cape Town | 01:31:56 | |
| Mason Laura | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:16 | |
| Tillmann Melanie | 2019 Oberhausen | 01:32:38 | |
| Van Der Velden Fenne | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:32:50 | |
| Van Rest Ilse | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:31:56 | |
| Charnock Vicki | 2024 London | 01:32:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Amsterdam | 01:33:31 | |
| 2024 Amsterdam | 00:00 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
