Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hendry Ian's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hendry Ian's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hendry Ian's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hendry Ian's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:03 | 49:48 to 46:45 | 65.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 01:10 | 06:58 to 05:48 | 25.1% |
| Rowing | 00:14 | 05:16 to 05:02 | 5.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:12 | 07:40 to 07:28 | 4.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:21 to 04:21 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:12 to 03:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:45 to 04:45 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:49 to 05:49 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:51 to 01:51 | 0.0% |
| Hendry Ian | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:10 | 00:00 | 05:00 +00:10 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:10 | 04:38 -00:17 | 05:00 +00:10 |
| Running 2 | 05:59 | 09:31 | 05:26 +00:33 | 09:38 -00:07 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 15:30 | 03:19 -00:07 | 15:04 +00:26 |
| Running 3 | 06:19 | 18:42 | 05:58 +00:21 | 18:23 +00:19 |
| Sled Pull | 04:45 | 25:01 | 05:41 -00:56 | 24:21 +00:40 |
| Running 4 | 06:15 | 29:46 | 05:57 +00:18 | 30:02 -00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:49 | 36:01 | 06:25 -00:36 | 35:59 +00:02 |
| Running 5 | 06:18 | 41:50 | 06:13 +00:05 | 42:24 -00:34 |
| Rowing | 05:16 | 48:08 | 05:05 +00:11 | 48:37 -00:29 |
| Running 6 | 06:18 | 53:24 | 06:02 +00:16 | 53:42 -00:18 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:51 | 59:42 | 02:26 -00:35 | 59:44 -00:02 |
| Running 7 | 06:15 | 01:01:33 | 06:01 +00:14 | 01:02:10 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:58 | 01:07:48 | 05:59 +00:59 | 01:08:11 -00:23 |
| Running 8 | 07:14 | 01:14:46 | 06:59 +00:15 | 01:14:10 +00:36 |
| Wall Balls | 07:40 | 01:22:00 | 07:51 -00:11 | 01:21:09 +00:51 |
| Roxzone | 07:36 | 01:37:16 | 08:16 -00:40 | 01:37:16 |
Ian Hendry's performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX race places him in the top 52% overall and top 53% in his age group, which is a commendable achievement. His total running time was slower than average by 03:47, suggesting that while he has a balanced profile, there's a slight inclination towards strength rather than running. The best lap time indicates a strong start, but comparing the subsequent running segments to the average shows a pattern of starting slightly too fast and not maintaining pace. On the strength side, Ian demonstrated exceptional performance in the Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, and Burpees Broad Jump, indicating a robust strength base. However, the Sandbag Lunges segment stood out as a significant area for improvement.
By addressing these areas of improvement and implementing the suggested strategies, Ian Hendry has the potential to significantly enhance his performance in future HYROX races. Consistency in training, coupled with a focused approach to addressing weaknesses, will be key to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mendonca Justin | 2024 Brisbane | 01:37:15 | |
| Bunting Dave | 2024 Melbourne | 01:36:46 | |
| Ferraris Massimiliano | 2024 Rimini | 01:37:05 | |
| Hofmann Michael | 2022 Wien | 01:36:53 | |
| Carre Martin | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:51 | |
| Baek Daniel | 2024 Anaheim | 01:37:37 | |
| Neuteboom Victor | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:36:57 | |
| Vasquez Alejandro | 2024 Malaga | 01:37:01 | |
| Khan Faiq | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:37:31 | |
| Hale James | 2023 Birmingham | 01:37:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:39 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:37:21 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
