Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Los Angeles using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 444 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Garcia Claudia's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Garcia Claudia's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Garcia Claudia's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Garcia Claudia's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 15:00. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 13:55 | 01:09:19 to 55:24 | 92.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:47 | 04:17 to 03:30 | 5.2% |
| Rowing | 00:12 | 06:07 to 05:55 | 1.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:53 to 02:48 | 0.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 05:36 to 05:35 | 0.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 07:02 to 07:02 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:17 to 06:17 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:15 to 06:15 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:17 to 04:17 | 0.0% |
| Garcia Claudia | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 06:00 -00:46 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:36 | 05:14 | 05:30 +00:06 | 06:00 -00:46 |
| Running 2 | 06:43 | 10:50 | 06:37 +00:06 | 11:30 -00:40 |
| Sled Push | 04:17 | 17:33 | 03:27 +00:50 | 18:07 -00:34 |
| Running 3 | 07:24 | 21:50 | 07:05 +00:19 | 21:34 +00:16 |
| Sled Pull | 07:02 | 29:14 | 07:34 -00:32 | 28:39 +00:35 |
| Running 4 | 08:38 | 36:16 | 07:08 +01:30 | 36:13 +00:03 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:17 | 44:54 | 08:49 -02:32 | 43:21 +01:33 |
| Running 5 | 07:58 | 51:11 | 07:25 +00:33 | 52:10 -00:59 |
| Rowing | 06:07 | 59:09 | 05:55 +00:12 | 59:35 -00:26 |
| Running 6 | 11:11 | 01:05:16 | 07:19 +03:52 | 01:05:30 -00:14 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:53 | 01:16:27 | 02:47 +00:06 | 01:12:49 +03:38 |
| Running 7 | 08:01 | 01:19:20 | 07:17 +00:44 | 01:15:36 +03:44 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:15 | 01:27:21 | 06:33 -00:18 | 01:22:53 +04:28 |
| Running 8 | 09:13 | 01:33:36 | 08:19 +00:54 | 01:29:26 +04:10 |
| Wall Balls | 04:17 | 01:42:49 | 07:05 -02:48 | 01:37:45 +05:04 |
| Roxzone | 07:21 | 01:54:18 | 09:28 -02:07 | 01:54:18 |
Claudia's best running lap was 00:05:14, which was 00:29 faster than the average. This suggests that she has good running capability and should continue to focus on developing her running skills.
10. Ski Erg: Claudia's time in the Ski Erg segment was 00:11 slower than the average. To improve her performance in this segment, she should focus on improving her technique and power on the Ski Erg machine. Incorporating specific Ski Erg drills and exercises into her training routine can help improve her performance in this segment.
11. Running 2: Claudia's time in Running 2 was 00:11 slower than the average. To improve her performance in this segment, she should focus on maintaining a steady pace and avoiding fatigue. Incorporating interval training and tempo runs into her training routine can help improve her running endurance and performance in this segment.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mutale Binta | 2024 Stockholm | 01:54:19 | |
| Steinmann Franziska | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:54:44 | |
| Field Sydney | 2022 London | 01:54:47 | |
| Fernandez Rianna | 2024 London | 01:53:57 | |
| Tan Jac | 2024 Singapore | 01:54:44 | |
| Santova Ivana | 2024 Gdansk | 01:54:06 | |
| Tomkinson Sarah | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:54:26 | |
| Alberico Catherine | 2023 New York | 01:54:03 | |
| van Goozen Jolanda | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:53:48 | |
| Arnich Solène | 2024 Madrid | 01:54:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:39:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
