Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Taylor Jack's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Taylor Jack's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Taylor Jack's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Taylor Jack's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 01:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:04 | 44:47 to 43:43 | 70.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:22 | 02:33 to 02:11 | 24.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 05:16 to 05:13 | 3.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:02 | 04:31 to 04:29 | 2.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:39 to 02:39 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:58 to 04:58 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:49 to 04:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:07 to 06:07 | 0.0% |
| Taylor Jack | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:06 | 00:00 | 04:45 +01:21 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:31 | 06:06 | 04:31 +00:00 | 04:45 +01:21 |
| Running 2 | 05:27 | 10:37 | 05:09 +00:18 | 09:16 +01:21 |
| Sled Push | 02:39 | 16:04 | 03:04 -00:25 | 14:25 +01:39 |
| Running 3 | 05:30 | 18:43 | 05:37 -00:07 | 17:29 +01:14 |
| Sled Pull | 04:58 | 24:13 | 05:15 -00:17 | 23:06 +01:07 |
| Running 4 | 05:35 | 29:11 | 05:37 -00:02 | 28:21 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:42 | 34:46 | 05:46 -01:04 | 33:58 +00:48 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 39:28 | 05:49 -00:13 | 39:44 -00:16 |
| Rowing | 04:49 | 45:04 | 04:55 -00:06 | 45:33 -00:29 |
| Running 6 | 05:25 | 49:53 | 05:39 -00:14 | 50:28 -00:35 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:33 | 55:18 | 02:18 +00:15 | 56:07 -00:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:27 | 57:51 | 05:38 -00:11 | 58:25 -00:34 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:16 | 01:03:18 | 05:29 -00:13 | 01:04:03 -00:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:08:34 | 06:20 -00:36 | 01:09:32 -00:58 |
| Wall Balls | 06:07 | 01:14:18 | 07:00 -00:53 | 01:15:52 -01:34 |
| Roxzone | 10:03 | 01:30:20 | 07:28 +02:35 | 01:30:20 |
Jack Taylor showcased a strong and competitive performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race. His overall rank in the top 42% of 4107 athletes and his age group rank in the top 44% of 672 athletes are commendable achievements. Jack's running performance was remarkably consistent throughout the race, with his total running time equal to the average. This indicates a balanced running profile, neither leaning heavily towards strength or endurance. It's worth noting that Jack maintained a steady pace during the initial segments of the race, indicating a well-executed pacing strategy.
Moving forward, Jack should consider the following strategies to enhance his race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robinson Christopher | 2022 London | 01:30:12 | |
| Decicco Michael | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:30:19 | |
| Malinowski Rafał | 2024 Gdansk | 01:29:59 | |
| Feuerschütz Simon | 2021 Hamburg | 01:30:13 | |
| Miskry Tariq | 2024 London | 01:30:37 | |
| Mcfadyen Andy | 2023 Glasgow | 01:29:57 | |
| Vettin Christian | 2018 Hamburg | 01:30:35 | |
| Duff Ben | 2023 Manchester | 01:30:29 | |
| Hobley Marcus | 2023 Birmingham | 01:30:32 | |
| Duda Mateusz | 2024 Poznan | 01:29:53 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Dubai | 01:29:48 | |
| 2024 Stockholm | 01:47:33 | |
| 2023 London | 01:38:02 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
