Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Milan using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 827 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:23 (From 53:33 to 51:10) | 51.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:24 (From 07:48 to 06:24) | 30.3% |
| BBJ | 00:45 (From 08:02 to 07:17) | 16.2% |
| Rowing | 00:03 (From 05:20 to 05:17) | 1.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 (From 02:47 to 02:45) | 0.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:43 to 04:43) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:21 to 03:21) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 05:47 to 05:47) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 05:38 to 05:38) | 0.0% |
| Ciccio Federico | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:12 | 00:00 | 05:19 +00:53 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:43 | 06:12 | 04:47 -00:04 | 05:19 +00:53 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 10:55 | 05:59 -00:41 | 10:06 +00:49 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 16:13 | 03:43 -00:22 | 16:05 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 06:23 | 19:34 | 06:35 -00:12 | 19:48 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 07:48 | 25:57 | 06:32 +01:16 | 26:23 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 08:23 | 33:45 | 06:34 +01:49 | 32:55 +00:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:02 | 42:08 | 07:22 +00:40 | 39:29 +02:39 |
| Running 5 | 07:29 | 50:10 | 06:53 +00:36 | 46:51 +03:19 |
| Rowing | 05:20 | 57:39 | 05:19 +00:01 | 53:44 +03:55 |
| Running 6 | 07:07 | 01:02:59 | 06:39 +00:28 | 59:03 +03:56 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:47 | 01:10:06 | 02:42 +00:05 | 01:05:42 +04:24 |
| Running 7 | 06:56 | 01:12:53 | 06:40 +00:16 | 01:08:24 +04:29 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:19:49 | 06:55 -01:08 | 01:15:04 +04:45 |
| Running 8 | 05:46 | 01:25:36 | 08:08 -02:22 | 01:21:59 +03:37 |
| Wall Balls | 05:38 | 01:31:22 | 08:52 -03:14 | 01:30:07 +01:15 |
| Roxzone | 12:00 | 01:48:54 | 09:55 +02:05 | 01:48:54 |
Federico Ciccio's performance in the 2024 Milan Hyrox event showcased a mixed profile with certain strengths and areas for improvement. While his overall rank placed him in the top 86% of athletes, indicating room for progress, he demonstrated strong capabilities in certain segments such as the Wall Balls and Sandbag Lunges, both completed significantly faster than the average. His performance suggests a hybrid profile with a slight skew towards strength-based exercises, evident from his faster times in the Ski Erg and Sled Push, though his Total running time was notably slower than the average, indicating a need for improvement in running endurance and speed. Federico's pacing was inconsistent, with a strong start in Running 2 and Running 3, but a noticeable slowdown in Running 4, indicating potential pacing issues or fatigue.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Kielbicki Michal | 2024 Gdansk | 01:48:40 | |
| Kelleher Colum | 2024 Malaga | 01:48:36 | |
| Alcock James | 2023 Manchester | 01:48:33 | |
| Bergenstråle Andreas | 2023 Stockholm | 01:48:48 | |
| Dekker Bartholomeus | 2023 Madrid | 01:48:42 | |
| Ferry Sam | 2024 London | 01:49:20 | |
| Tosato Gianandrea | 2024 Milan | 01:48:47 | |
| Schapendonk Mike | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:48:37 | |
| Le Calvez Erwan | 2023 Paris | 01:49:09 | |
| Drouet Louis | 2024 Paris | 01:49:03 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rimini Ciccio Federico | 01:51:31 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Ciccio Federico
