Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Staub Pelle's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Staub Pelle's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Staub Pelle's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Staub Pelle's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:45. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:22 | 41:29 to 38:07 | 70.9% |
| Wall Balls | 00:43 | 05:55 to 05:12 | 15.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:12 | 04:24 to 04:12 | 4.2% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:12 | 02:00 to 01:48 | 4.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:07 | 02:27 to 02:20 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:06 | 04:19 to 04:13 | 2.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:03 | 04:15 to 04:12 | 1.1% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Staub Pelle | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:44 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:34 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:19 | 03:44 | 04:19 +00:00 | 04:18 -00:34 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 08:03 | 04:36 +00:32 | 08:37 -00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:27 | 13:11 | 02:39 -00:12 | 13:13 -00:02 |
| Running 3 | 05:13 | 15:38 | 04:59 +00:14 | 15:52 -00:14 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 20:51 | 04:25 -00:32 | 20:51 +00:00 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 24:44 | 04:58 +00:21 | 25:16 -00:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:24 | 30:03 | 04:36 -00:12 | 30:14 -00:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:36 | 34:27 | 05:06 +00:30 | 34:50 -00:23 |
| Rowing | 04:22 | 40:03 | 04:38 -00:16 | 39:56 +00:07 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 44:25 | 05:00 +00:22 | 44:34 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 49:47 | 01:59 +00:01 | 49:34 +00:13 |
| Running 7 | 05:15 | 51:47 | 04:59 +00:16 | 51:33 +00:14 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:15 | 57:02 | 04:32 -00:17 | 56:32 +00:30 |
| Running 8 | 05:55 | 01:01:17 | 05:26 +00:29 | 01:01:04 +00:13 |
| Wall Balls | 05:55 | 01:07:12 | 05:42 +00:13 | 01:06:30 +00:42 |
| Roxzone | 05:07 | 01:18:07 | 05:55 -00:48 | 01:18:07 |
Pelle Staub delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox event, securing the 573rd overall rank, placing in the top 18% of all competitors. Within his age group (25-29), he ranked 122nd, marking him in the top 19%. His overall finish time was 01:18:07, a reflection of consistent effort throughout the race.
In terms of pacing, Pelle started strong, as indicated by his first running segment being significantly faster than average. However, his subsequent running times lagged, suggesting a potential early fatigue or the need for pacing adjustments. His total running time was slightly slower than average, pointing to a potential need for enhanced endurance or pacing strategies.
From a profile perspective, Pelle exhibits a balanced athlete profile with strengths in both running and strength-based exercises. However, the slightly slower total running time suggests a need for improved running efficiency and endurance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Walker Adam | 2022 London | 01:18:19 | |
| Tullett Zacc | 2024 London | 01:18:11 | |
| DAlessandro Bryan | 2024 Dallas | 01:18:37 | |
| Primke Tobias | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:17:41 | |
| Van Klaveren Simeon | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:09 | |
| Kenning Dylan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:18:19 | |
| Tabone Matthew | 2023 Milan | 01:18:08 | |
| Lyttle Ryan | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:16 | |
| Brien Aaron | 2022 Birmingham | 01:17:37 | |
| Hulshof Johnno | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:18:33 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:35:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
