Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Bremen using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Zippack Martin's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Zippack Martin's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Zippack Martin's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Zippack Martin's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:12. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:16 | 07:25 to 05:09 | 43.6% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:13 | 05:22 to 04:09 | 23.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:52 | 05:02 to 04:10 | 16.7% |
| Run Total | 00:22 | 38:17 to 37:55 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:35 to 02:19 | 5.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:01 to 01:48 | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Zippack Martin | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:35 | 00:00 | 04:18 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:35 | 04:19 -00:07 | 04:18 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 04:13 | 07:47 | 04:36 -00:23 | 08:37 -00:50 |
| Sled Push | 02:35 | 12:00 | 02:39 -00:04 | 13:13 -01:13 |
| Running 3 | 05:10 | 14:35 | 04:59 +00:11 | 15:52 -01:17 |
| Sled Pull | 04:00 | 19:45 | 04:24 -00:24 | 20:51 -01:06 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 23:45 | 04:57 +00:06 | 25:15 -01:30 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:22 | 28:48 | 04:36 +00:46 | 30:12 -01:24 |
| Running 5 | 05:09 | 34:10 | 05:05 +00:04 | 34:48 -00:38 |
| Rowing | 04:30 | 39:19 | 04:38 -00:08 | 39:53 -00:34 |
| Running 6 | 05:02 | 43:49 | 04:59 +00:03 | 44:31 -00:42 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:01 | 48:51 | 01:59 +00:02 | 49:30 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 04:43 | 50:52 | 04:58 -00:15 | 51:29 -00:37 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:02 | 55:35 | 04:31 +00:31 | 56:27 -00:52 |
| Running 8 | 05:25 | 01:00:37 | 05:25 +00:00 | 01:00:58 -00:21 |
| Wall Balls | 07:25 | 01:06:02 | 05:42 +01:43 | 01:06:23 -00:21 |
| Roxzone | 04:37 | 01:17:55 | 05:50 -01:13 | 01:17:55 |
When analyzing Martin's splits, it is evident that he excelled in several segments. His running 1, Ski Erg, Running 2, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Running 7, and Farmers Carry times were faster than the average for his finish time, highlighting his strength in these areas. In particular, his running 1 time of 00:03:35 was an impressive 00:34 faster than average, indicating his exceptional running ability.
However, there were a few segments where Martin lost valuable time. The Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sandbag Lunges proved to be the most challenging for him, with times significantly slower than the average. Identifying these segments as areas for improvement will help Martin enhance his overall performance.
In conclusion, Martin Zippack showcased impressive performance in the 2022 Bremen HYROX race. While he excelled in several segments, there are areas for improvement, including Wall Balls, Burpees Broad Jump, and Sandbag Lunges. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, Martin can enhance his overall performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Huart Frédéric | 2024 Paris | 01:17:51 | |
| Elvebakk Ole André | 2024 Stockholm | 01:18:14 | |
| Dennedy Michael | 2024 Stockholm | 01:18:17 | |
| Zinken Sascha | 2022 Essen | 01:17:54 | |
| Dimec Anže | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:18:03 | |
| Vallance Dan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:33 | |
| Mühl Steffen | 2020 Hannover | 01:17:45 | |
| Rooney Brendan | 2024 Birmingham | 01:17:43 | |
| Nevel Oliver | 2022 London | 01:18:14 | |
| Najera Kévin | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:17:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Hamburg | 01:09:51 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
