Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Williams Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Williams Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Williams Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Williams Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:06. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:41 | 38:28 to 36:47 | 41.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:56 | 05:51 to 04:55 | 22.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 02:44 to 02:13 | 12.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 04:20 to 03:50 | 12.2% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:23 | 04:22 to 03:59 | 9.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 01:48 to 01:43 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:10 to 03:10 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:24 to 04:24 | 0.0% |
| Williams Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:57 | 00:00 | 04:14 +00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:05 | 04:57 | 04:17 -00:12 | 04:14 +00:43 |
| Running 2 | 04:24 | 09:02 | 04:30 -00:06 | 08:31 +00:31 |
| Sled Push | 02:44 | 13:26 | 02:35 +00:09 | 13:01 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 04:39 | 16:10 | 04:52 -00:13 | 15:36 +00:34 |
| Sled Pull | 04:20 | 20:49 | 04:17 +00:03 | 20:28 +00:21 |
| Running 4 | 04:43 | 25:09 | 04:50 -00:07 | 24:45 +00:24 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:10 | 29:52 | 04:26 -01:16 | 29:35 +00:17 |
| Running 5 | 05:01 | 33:02 | 04:57 +00:04 | 34:01 -00:59 |
| Rowing | 04:24 | 38:03 | 04:35 -00:11 | 38:58 -00:55 |
| Running 6 | 04:53 | 42:27 | 04:52 +00:01 | 43:33 -01:06 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 47:20 | 01:56 -00:08 | 48:25 -01:05 |
| Running 7 | 04:53 | 49:08 | 04:50 +00:03 | 50:21 -01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 54:01 | 04:24 -00:02 | 55:11 -01:10 |
| Running 8 | 05:02 | 58:23 | 05:13 -00:11 | 59:35 -01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 05:51 | 01:03:25 | 05:30 +00:21 | 01:04:48 -01:23 |
| Roxzone | 06:49 | 01:15:56 | 05:38 +01:11 | 01:15:56 |
Mark Williams has displayed an impressive performance in the 2024 Madrid Hyrox race. Ranking in the top 14% of 1509 athletes overall and 13% in his age group, Mark has showcased considerable strength and endurance. His overall time was 01:15:56, demonstrating a balanced performance. His total running time was 00:38:28, which is 00:04 faster than the average. This suggests that Mark has a more runner profile and he managed to maintain a consistent speed throughout the race.
Mark's start in the race was slower than average but he managed to pick up the pace in the subsequent segments. His best running lap was 00:04:24, indicating a strong capacity for speed. However, he seemed to slow down in the roxzone, spending 01:20 more time than the average athlete, possibly indicating fatigue.
Mark could benefit from implementing the following strategies in his races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| García González José Joaquín | 2024 Malaga | 01:15:33 | |
| Rivetti Filippo | 2024 Milan | 01:16:21 | |
| Connor Ben | 2024 Poznan | 01:15:59 | |
| Dahlberg John | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:15:38 | |
| Hughes Chase | 2021 Dallas | 01:15:53 | |
| Shaikh Suleman | 2024 Köln | 01:15:36 | |
| Marica Sergio | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:15:28 | |
| Cotton Zac | 2022 Birmingham | 01:15:37 | |
| Styn Angelo | 2019 Hamburg | 01:15:53 | |
| Penkner Yannick | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:04:44 | |
| 2022 London | 01:02:55 | |
| 2022 Manchester | 01:07:18 | |
| 2023 World Championships Manchester | 01:03:11 | |
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
