Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Tate Ashley's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Tate Ashley's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Tate Ashley's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Tate Ashley's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:21. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:55 | 41:42 to 39:47 | 57.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:30 | 04:49 to 04:19 | 14.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:50 to 02:31 | 9.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:15 | 04:44 to 04:29 | 7.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:11 | 04:45 to 04:34 | 5.5% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 04:48 to 04:37 | 5.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 03:56 to 03:56 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:40 to 01:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:31 to 05:31 | 0.0% |
| Tate Ashley | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:02 | 00:00 | 04:29 -01:27 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 03:56 | 03:02 | 04:23 -00:27 | 04:29 -01:27 |
| Running 2 | 04:39 | 06:58 | 04:46 -00:07 | 08:52 -01:54 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 11:37 | 02:46 +00:04 | 13:38 -02:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 14:27 | 05:10 +00:27 | 16:24 -01:57 |
| Sled Pull | 04:49 | 20:04 | 04:40 +00:09 | 21:34 -01:30 |
| Running 4 | 05:34 | 24:53 | 05:08 +00:26 | 26:14 -01:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:45 | 30:27 | 04:57 -00:12 | 31:22 -00:55 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 35:12 | 05:18 +00:23 | 36:19 -01:07 |
| Rowing | 04:48 | 40:53 | 04:43 +00:05 | 41:37 -00:44 |
| Running 6 | 05:21 | 45:41 | 05:11 +00:10 | 46:20 -00:39 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:40 | 51:02 | 02:05 -00:25 | 51:31 -00:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:41 | 52:42 | 05:09 +00:32 | 53:36 -00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 58:23 | 04:50 -00:06 | 58:45 -00:22 |
| Running 8 | 06:09 | 01:03:07 | 05:40 +00:29 | 01:03:35 -00:28 |
| Wall Balls | 05:31 | 01:09:16 | 06:06 -00:35 | 01:09:15 +00:01 |
| Roxzone | 07:01 | 01:21:41 | 06:20 +00:41 | 01:21:41 |
Ashley Tate's performance in the 2024 Manchester Hyrox race demonstrates a strong overall performance, placing in the top 54% of athletes and the top 55% of his age group. His total running time was marginally slower than average, indicating a potential need for increased focus on his running training. Ashley's pacing appeared to be inconsistent, as he started out significantly faster than average in the first running segment, but then progressively slowed down in each subsequent running segment. Given that his performance in strength-based exercises such as the Ski Erg, Farmers Carry, and Wall Balls was faster than average, it suggests that Ashley's profile leans more towards strength than running.
Given Ashley's strong start in the race, it's recommended that he focus on maintaining a consistent pace throughout. This could be achieved through regular tempo runs and race pace training. In addition, focusing on recovery and ensuring a proper warm-up before the race could help prevent fatigue in the latter stages. Lastly, practicing transitions between exercises could help reduce his Roxzone time, improving his overall race time.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Crisman Alex | 2023 Dallas | 01:21:30 | |
| Hector Freitas Hector | 2023 Paris | 01:21:39 | |
| Rousing Anders | 2024 Stockholm | 01:21:18 | |
| Schmerfeld Luca | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:21:25 | |
| Cook Richard | 2023 London | 01:21:44 | |
| Allen Gavin | 2023 Melbourne | 01:21:16 | |
| Kenny Tony | 2023 Birmingham | 01:21:34 | |
| Schuyler Brady | 2020 Chicago | 01:22:03 | |
| Aliaga Koczy Marco Antonio | 2022 Madrid | 01:22:00 | |
| Theis Alexander | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:21:28 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 London | 01:13:57 | |
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:20:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
