Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pryor Andrew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pryor Andrew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pryor Andrew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pryor Andrew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:40. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:01 | 51:16 to 45:15 | 78.5% |
| Sled Push | 01:29 | 04:34 to 03:05 | 19.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:28 to 02:18 | 2.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:47 to 04:47 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:30 to 05:30 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:02 to 07:02 | 0.0% |
| Pryor Andrew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:58 | 00:00 | 04:53 -00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 03:58 | 04:34 -00:09 | 04:53 -00:55 |
| Running 2 | 04:42 | 08:23 | 05:21 -00:39 | 09:27 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 04:34 | 13:05 | 03:12 +01:22 | 14:48 -01:43 |
| Running 3 | 03:19 | 17:39 | 05:52 -02:33 | 18:00 -00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:47 | 20:58 | 05:30 -00:43 | 23:52 -02:54 |
| Running 4 | 03:13 | 25:45 | 05:50 -02:37 | 29:22 -03:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:11 | 28:58 | 06:07 -01:56 | 35:12 -06:14 |
| Running 5 | 05:11 | 33:09 | 06:03 -00:52 | 41:19 -08:10 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 38:20 | 05:00 -00:21 | 47:22 -09:02 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 42:59 | 05:53 -00:44 | 52:22 -09:23 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 48:08 | 02:23 +00:05 | 58:15 -10:07 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 50:36 | 05:51 -00:48 | 01:00:38 -10:02 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:30 | 55:39 | 05:43 -00:13 | 01:06:29 -10:50 |
| Running 8 | 05:44 | 01:01:09 | 06:41 -00:57 | 01:12:12 -11:03 |
| Wall Balls | 07:02 | 01:06:53 | 07:24 -00:22 | 01:18:53 -12:00 |
| Roxzone | 20:24 | 01:34:10 | 07:53 +12:31 | 01:34:10 |
Pacing and Profile:
Based on the splits analysis, Andrew demonstrated a well-paced race with consistent performance across most segments. His best lap time of 00:18:13 indicates that he has the ability to perform at a high level. However, there are areas where he lost time, specifically in the Roxzone and Sled Push segments.
Andrew's running time of 00:51:16 was 06:48 slower than the average for his finish time. This suggests that he may need to focus more on his overall fitness and transition time, as well as improving his running performance. It is important for him to work on both strength and running to achieve a more balanced fitness level.
In conclusion, Andrew Pryor had a commendable performance in the 2022 Manchester Hyrox race. To further improve his performance, he should focus on reducing transition times in the Roxzone, building strength for the Sled Push segment, and enhancing his overall running performance. By incorporating specific training strategies, exercises, and drills tailored to these areas, Andrew can continue to progress and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Morris Gavin | 2022 London | 01:33:48 | |
| Dieterle Fabian | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:34:13 | |
| Kharchevskyi Anton | 2022 London | 01:34:01 | |
| Mutimer Aaron | 2024 Melbourne | 01:33:47 | |
| Schuster Stephano | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:34:27 | |
| Womersley Tom | 2024 London | 01:33:54 | |
| Rodriguez Raul | 2022 Chicago | 01:34:16 | |
| Lipfert Dirk | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:34:40 | |
| Burckardt Frank | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:33:52 | |
| Veit Philipp | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:34:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:25:27 | |
| 2024 London | 01:22:46 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
