Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2021 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Postma Patrick's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Postma Patrick's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Postma Patrick's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Postma Patrick's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:58 | 46:37 to 41:39 | 93.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:13 | 02:16 to 02:03 | 4.1% |
| Rowing | 00:08 | 04:52 to 04:44 | 2.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:24 to 04:23 | 0.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:11 to 04:11 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:22 to 04:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:26 to 05:26 | 0.0% |
| Postma Patrick | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:02 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:02 | 04:27 -00:03 | 04:36 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:59 | 09:26 | 04:58 +00:01 | 09:03 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 14:25 | 02:55 -01:01 | 14:01 +00:24 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 16:19 | 05:24 +00:11 | 16:56 -00:37 |
| Sled Pull | 04:15 | 21:54 | 04:57 -00:42 | 22:20 -00:26 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 26:09 | 05:22 +00:28 | 27:17 -01:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:11 | 31:59 | 05:19 -01:08 | 32:39 -00:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 36:10 | 05:33 +00:08 | 37:58 -01:48 |
| Rowing | 04:52 | 41:51 | 04:49 +00:03 | 43:31 -01:40 |
| Running 6 | 06:16 | 46:43 | 05:24 +00:52 | 48:20 -01:37 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:16 | 52:59 | 02:11 +00:05 | 53:44 -00:45 |
| Running 7 | 06:07 | 55:15 | 05:23 +00:44 | 55:55 -00:40 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:22 | 01:01:22 | 05:06 -00:44 | 01:01:18 +00:04 |
| Running 8 | 07:11 | 01:05:44 | 06:00 +01:11 | 01:06:24 -00:40 |
| Wall Balls | 05:26 | 01:12:55 | 06:31 -01:05 | 01:12:24 +00:31 |
| Roxzone | 07:35 | 01:25:48 | 06:53 +00:42 | 01:25:48 |
Patrick's splits analysis shows that he performed slightly slower than average in most segments, with the exception of the sled push and sled pull where he performed significantly faster than average. His best running lap was 00:04:59.
In conclusion, Patrick Postma had a solid performance in the 2021 Amsterdam Hyrox race. To improve his overall performance, he should focus on improving his running ability, reducing transition times in the Roxzone, and implementing targeted training strategies for the specific segments where he lost the most time. By incorporating specific exercises, drills, and training routines, Patrick can enhance his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Hickey Paul | 2023 Dublin | 01:26:18 | |
| Plaza Goicoechea Francisco Javier | 2021 Madrid | 01:25:58 | |
| Ali Sylvain | 2024 Paris | 01:25:34 | |
| Badenhorst Frans | 2024 London | 01:26:08 | |
| Mayer Sébastien | 2024 Madrid | 01:25:53 | |
| Moore Steve | 2024 Marseille | 01:25:24 | |
| Hetherington Richard | 2024 Birmingham | 01:25:28 | |
| Nguyen Hung | 2021 Amsterdam | 01:25:43 | |
| Wiley Nathan | 2024 Anaheim | 01:25:18 | |
| Venne Stephane | 2024 Stockholm | 01:25:27 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Maastricht | 01:26:30 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
