Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Hamburg using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Paegelow Marcus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Paegelow Marcus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Paegelow Marcus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Paegelow Marcus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:44 | 06:22 to 04:38 | 49.5% |
| Run Total | 00:56 | 42:35 to 41:39 | 26.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:26 | 04:49 to 04:23 | 12.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:23 | 03:05 to 02:42 | 11.0% |
| Rowing | 00:01 | 04:45 to 04:44 | 0.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:15 to 04:15 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:15 to 05:15 | 0.0% |
| Paegelow Marcus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:37 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:01 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:49 | 04:37 | 04:27 +00:22 | 04:36 +00:01 |
| Running 2 | 04:27 | 09:26 | 04:58 -00:31 | 09:03 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 03:05 | 13:53 | 02:55 +00:10 | 14:01 -00:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:08 | 16:58 | 05:24 -00:16 | 16:56 +00:02 |
| Sled Pull | 06:22 | 22:06 | 04:58 +01:24 | 22:20 -00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 28:28 | 05:23 -00:02 | 27:18 +01:10 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:15 | 33:49 | 05:19 -01:04 | 32:41 +01:08 |
| Running 5 | 05:20 | 38:04 | 05:33 -00:13 | 38:00 +00:04 |
| Rowing | 04:45 | 43:24 | 04:49 -00:04 | 43:33 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 05:09 | 48:09 | 05:25 -00:16 | 48:22 -00:13 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:54 | 53:18 | 02:11 -00:17 | 53:47 -00:29 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 55:12 | 05:23 -00:07 | 55:58 -00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:29 | 01:00:28 | 05:06 -00:37 | 01:01:21 -00:53 |
| Running 8 | 07:20 | 01:04:57 | 06:00 +01:20 | 01:06:27 -01:30 |
| Wall Balls | 05:15 | 01:12:17 | 06:31 -01:16 | 01:12:27 -00:10 |
| Roxzone | 08:28 | 01:25:51 | 06:53 +01:35 | 01:25:51 |
In terms of his splits, Marcus had a total running time of 00:42:35, which was 01:07 slower than the average. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his running ability to become more competitive. His best running lap was 00:04:27, which was 00:30 faster than the average. This suggests that Marcus has the potential to excel in running segments.
By implementing these strategies and focusing on improving the identified areas, Marcus Paegelow can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races and achieve even better results.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Witting Michel | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:51 | |
| Sundar Avin | 2024 Dallas | 01:25:45 | |
| Persson Silfverbrand Andreas | 2023 Malmö | 01:25:30 | |
| Schultchen Andrè | 2022 Leipzig | 01:26:04 | |
| Williams Kyle | 2023 Anaheim | 01:25:35 | |
| Phillips Andy | 2024 Glasgow | 01:26:09 | |
| Kuich Krzysztof | 2024 Katowice | 01:25:40 | |
| Hackett Samuel | 2023 Anaheim | 01:26:21 | |
| Tilson Braden | 2023 Chicago | 01:25:42 | |
| Burke Jonathan | 2024 Dallas | 01:25:49 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
