Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Singapore using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ng Elston's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ng Elston's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ng Elston's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ng Elston's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:30. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:10 | 10:10 to 08:00 | 48.1% |
| Sled Pull | 01:03 | 06:56 to 05:53 | 23.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:39 | 05:21 to 04:42 | 14.4% |
| Rowing | 00:22 | 05:30 to 05:08 | 8.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:16 | 02:49 to 02:33 | 5.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:56 to 02:56 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:59 to 05:59 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:46 to 05:46 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 48:12 to 48:12 | 0.0% |
| Ng Elston | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:51 | 00:00 | 05:09 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:21 | 04:51 | 04:40 +00:41 | 05:09 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 10:12 | 05:41 -00:10 | 09:49 +00:23 |
| Sled Push | 02:56 | 15:43 | 03:29 -00:33 | 15:30 +00:13 |
| Running 3 | 06:09 | 18:39 | 06:16 -00:07 | 18:59 -00:20 |
| Sled Pull | 06:56 | 24:48 | 06:02 +00:54 | 25:15 -00:27 |
| Running 4 | 06:31 | 31:44 | 06:15 +00:16 | 31:17 +00:27 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:59 | 38:15 | 06:45 -00:46 | 37:32 +00:43 |
| Running 5 | 06:05 | 44:14 | 06:30 -00:25 | 44:17 -00:03 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 50:19 | 05:11 +00:19 | 50:47 -00:28 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 55:49 | 06:18 -00:33 | 55:58 -00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 01:01:34 | 02:35 +00:14 | 01:02:16 -00:42 |
| Running 7 | 05:57 | 01:04:23 | 06:18 -00:21 | 01:04:51 -00:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:46 | 01:10:20 | 06:18 -00:32 | 01:11:09 -00:49 |
| Running 8 | 07:27 | 01:16:06 | 07:25 +00:02 | 01:17:27 -01:21 |
| Wall Balls | 10:10 | 01:23:33 | 08:14 +01:56 | 01:24:52 -01:19 |
| Roxzone | 08:24 | 01:41:59 | 08:53 -00:29 | 01:41:59 |
Elston Ng delivered a commendable performance, finishing in the top 40% overall and top 42% within his age group. His total running time was notably faster than the average, suggesting a strong running profile. Elston's pacing strategy appeared well-balanced, with consistent running speeds, although his initial segment was slightly faster than average, indicating a potentially aggressive start. This running advantage is beneficial; however, his performance in strength-based exercises and transitions indicates room for improvement.
Elston was 41 seconds slower than average. Focus on improving technique and efficiency.
55 seconds slower than average. Enhanced grip strength and pulling technique are needed.
Elston was 1:58 slower than average, indicating significant room for improvement in this segment.
19 seconds slower than average. Work on rowing technique and cardiovascular conditioning.
13 seconds slower than average. Improve grip strength and stability during carries.
While faster than average, optimizing transition times can further improve overall race efficiency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ekkelboom Johan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:41:37 | |
| De Rezende Aquino Alberto | 2022 Madrid | 01:41:55 | |
| Schrock Stefan | 2024 Berlin | 01:42:25 | |
| Odderskjær Waltenburg Hansen Marcus | 2023 Malmö | 01:42:27 | |
| Peral Oliveira Marcos | 2024 Madrid | 01:42:16 | |
| Eigenhuis Rick | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:42:27 | |
| Klös Dennis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:42:15 | |
| Owens Alston | 2022 London | 01:41:40 | |
| Slim Raven | 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:42:08 | |
| Wenske Kai | 2023 Köln | 01:41:46 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
