Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Kühnle Niko's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Kühnle Niko's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Kühnle Niko's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Kühnle Niko's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 02:18 | 06:56 to 04:38 | 55.0% |
| Run Total | 01:07 | 42:46 to 41:39 | 26.7% |
| Ski Erg | 00:18 | 04:41 to 04:23 | 7.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:10 | 05:10 to 05:00 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:10 | 02:13 to 02:03 | 4.0% |
| Rowing | 00:07 | 04:51 to 04:44 | 2.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:01 | 02:43 to 02:42 | 0.4% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:40 to 03:40 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Kühnle Niko | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:56 | 00:00 | 04:36 +00:20 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:41 | 04:56 | 04:27 +00:14 | 04:36 +00:20 |
| Running 2 | 05:07 | 09:37 | 04:57 +00:10 | 09:03 +00:34 |
| Sled Push | 02:43 | 14:44 | 02:55 -00:12 | 14:00 +00:44 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 17:27 | 05:24 +00:13 | 16:55 +00:32 |
| Sled Pull | 06:56 | 23:04 | 04:57 +01:59 | 22:19 +00:45 |
| Running 4 | 05:24 | 30:00 | 05:22 +00:02 | 27:16 +02:44 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:10 | 35:24 | 05:19 -00:09 | 32:38 +02:46 |
| Running 5 | 05:26 | 40:34 | 05:33 -00:07 | 37:57 +02:37 |
| Rowing | 04:51 | 46:00 | 04:49 +00:02 | 43:30 +02:30 |
| Running 6 | 05:18 | 50:51 | 05:24 -00:06 | 48:19 +02:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:13 | 56:09 | 02:11 +00:02 | 53:43 +02:26 |
| Running 7 | 05:20 | 58:22 | 05:23 -00:03 | 55:54 +02:28 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:40 | 01:03:42 | 05:06 -01:26 | 01:01:17 +02:25 |
| Running 8 | 05:41 | 01:07:22 | 05:59 -00:18 | 01:06:23 +00:59 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:13:03 | 06:31 -00:56 | 01:12:22 +00:41 |
| Roxzone | 07:16 | 01:25:45 | 06:52 +00:24 | 01:25:45 |
Pacing: It appears that Niko may have started the race too fast, as he was slower than average in the second part of the race. It is important for him to pace himself properly throughout the entire race to maintain energy and performance levels.
Profile: Niko's total running time of 00:42:46 indicates that he has a good running profile. However, he can still benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to reduce the time spent in the roxzone.
By implementing these training strategies and race strategies, Niko Kühnle can further enhance his performance in future HYROX races. It is important to remember that consistent training, proper rest, and a balanced nutrition plan are key components to achieving optimal performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fehrle Kai | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:25:47 | |
| Ruhdorfer Bene | 2023 München | 01:25:26 | |
| Van Brakel Maurits | 2023 Amsterdam | 01:25:58 | |
| Scott Kevin | 2022 New York | 01:25:46 | |
| Kühn Ronny | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:25:41 | |
| Thakker Janak | 2023 Stockholm | 01:25:53 | |
| Juanes Repila Alvaro | 2022 Madrid | 01:26:15 | |
| Choi Shing Min Vincent | 2024 London | 01:26:11 | |
| De Azevedo Rodrigues Sergio | 2024 Incheon | 01:25:38 | |
| Van Oijen Chris | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:26:05 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2018 Stuttgart | 01:48:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
