Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Hopkins David's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Hopkins David's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Hopkins David's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Hopkins David's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:56. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:29 | 49:29 to 47:00 | 84.7% |
| Rowing | 00:11 | 05:14 to 05:03 | 6.3% |
| Wall Balls | 00:08 | 07:40 to 07:32 | 4.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:42 to 04:38 | 2.3% |
| Sled Pull | 00:04 | 05:40 to 05:36 | 2.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:38 to 02:38 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:29 to 05:29 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:10 to 02:10 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:42 to 05:42 | 0.0% |
| Hopkins David | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:54 | 00:00 | 05:02 -00:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:42 | 04:54 | 04:38 +00:04 | 05:02 -00:08 |
| Running 2 | 05:50 | 09:36 | 05:28 +00:22 | 09:40 -00:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 15:26 | 03:18 -00:40 | 15:08 +00:18 |
| Running 3 | 06:17 | 18:04 | 06:00 +00:17 | 18:26 -00:22 |
| Sled Pull | 05:40 | 24:21 | 05:43 -00:03 | 24:26 -00:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:13 | 30:01 | 06:01 +00:12 | 30:09 -00:08 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:29 | 36:14 | 06:28 -00:59 | 36:10 +00:04 |
| Running 5 | 06:24 | 41:43 | 06:15 +00:09 | 42:38 -00:55 |
| Rowing | 05:14 | 48:07 | 05:06 +00:08 | 48:53 -00:46 |
| Running 6 | 06:02 | 53:21 | 06:03 -00:01 | 53:59 -00:38 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:10 | 59:23 | 02:27 -00:17 | 01:00:02 -00:39 |
| Running 7 | 06:19 | 01:01:33 | 06:03 +00:16 | 01:02:29 -00:56 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:42 | 01:07:52 | 06:04 -00:22 | 01:08:32 -00:40 |
| Running 8 | 07:33 | 01:13:34 | 07:02 +00:31 | 01:14:36 -01:02 |
| Wall Balls | 07:40 | 01:21:07 | 07:51 -00:11 | 01:21:38 -00:31 |
| Roxzone | 09:05 | 01:37:47 | 08:18 +00:47 | 01:37:47 |
David Hopkins demonstrated a commendable performance at the 2024 Paris HYROX race, ranking within the top 75% of all athletes and the top 72% of his age group. His performance was particularly impressive in the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump segments, where he significantly outpaced the average times. However, his overall running time was slower than the average, indicating that this is an area for improvement. David showcases a stronger profile in strength-based segments than in running, which is evident in his fast times in strength-focused exercises like the Sled Push and Burpees Broad Jump.
Implementing the following strategies may lead to better race performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathieson Rhys | 2023 Melbourne | 01:38:16 | |
| Vega González Jose Alberto | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:37:35 | |
| Lewis David | 2024 Milan | 01:37:49 | |
| Jędrzejewski Damian | 2024 Gdansk | 01:38:17 | |
| Fallmann Christoph Emil | 2023 München | 01:37:27 | |
| Denwood Fin | 2022 London | 01:37:57 | |
| Bogner Manuel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:37:48 | |
| Laird Kyle | 2021 Los Angeles | 01:37:29 | |
| Errigo Alberto | 2024 Melbourne | 01:38:02 | |
| Howes Adam | 2023 Melbourne | 01:37:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Malaga | 02:13:38 | |
| 2023 London | 01:30:45 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
