Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grainger Daniel's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grainger Daniel's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grainger Daniel's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grainger Daniel's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:05. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:24 | 05:37 to 04:13 | 27.5% |
| Wall Balls | 01:04 | 06:31 to 05:27 | 21.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:01 | 05:28 to 04:27 | 20.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:44 | 05:08 to 04:24 | 14.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:33 | 03:00 to 02:27 | 10.8% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:50 to 04:35 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:04 | 04:20 to 04:16 | 1.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:35 to 01:35 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 36:55 to 36:55 | 0.0% |
| Grainger Daniel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:35 | 00:00 | 04:23 +00:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:35 | 04:21 -00:01 | 04:23 +00:12 |
| Running 2 | 04:02 | 08:55 | 04:44 -00:42 | 08:44 +00:11 |
| Sled Push | 03:00 | 12:57 | 02:44 +00:16 | 13:28 -00:31 |
| Running 3 | 04:27 | 15:57 | 05:07 -00:40 | 16:12 -00:15 |
| Sled Pull | 05:37 | 20:24 | 04:35 +01:02 | 21:19 -00:55 |
| Running 4 | 04:43 | 26:01 | 05:06 -00:23 | 25:54 +00:07 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:28 | 30:44 | 04:54 +00:34 | 31:00 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 04:53 | 36:12 | 05:15 -00:22 | 35:54 +00:18 |
| Rowing | 04:50 | 41:05 | 04:41 +00:09 | 41:09 -00:04 |
| Running 6 | 04:34 | 45:55 | 05:08 -00:34 | 45:50 +00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:35 | 50:29 | 02:04 -00:29 | 50:58 -00:29 |
| Running 7 | 04:35 | 52:04 | 05:06 -00:31 | 53:02 -00:58 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:08 | 56:39 | 04:44 +00:24 | 58:08 -01:29 |
| Running 8 | 05:09 | 01:01:47 | 05:35 -00:26 | 01:02:52 -01:05 |
| Wall Balls | 06:31 | 01:06:56 | 05:57 +00:34 | 01:08:27 -01:31 |
| Roxzone | 07:15 | 01:20:34 | 06:10 +01:05 | 01:20:34 |
Daniel Grainger demonstrated a strong performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX race, ranking in the top 23% of all athletes and the top 26% within his age group. His overall time was 1 hour, 20 minutes, and 34 seconds, showing a remarkable stamina and resilience.
One of the significant highlights of Daniel's performance is his running prowess. His total running time was 36 minutes and 55 seconds, which is 3 minutes and 44 seconds faster than average. This indicates that he has a strong runner profile. However, it's crucial to balance this with strength training to improve overall performance and timing.
Looking at his pacing, Daniel started slower in Running 1 but significantly improved his speed in the subsequent running segments, consistently outpacing the average times. This shows that he has excellent endurance and ability to pace himself, which is crucial in endurance races like HYROX.
For better performance in future races, Daniel should consider the following strategies:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Baniewski Jakub | 2024 Berlin | 01:20:46 | |
| Bryon Jordy | 2023 Köln | 01:20:51 | |
| Fullbrook Luke | 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:15 | |
| Levall Stephen | 2023 Dallas | 01:20:13 | |
| Keay Callum | 2023 Madrid | 01:20:53 | |
| Chivers Ben | 2024 London | 01:20:57 | |
| Allan Marshall | 2024 Stockholm | 01:20:51 | |
| Van Apeldoorn Carlo | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:20:20 | |
| De Ruiter Mark | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:20:32 | |
| Grant Stuart James | 2024 London | 01:20:24 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
