Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Manchester using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Driver Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Driver Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Driver Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Driver Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:41. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 04:37 | 45:06 to 40:29 | 81.2% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:04 | 05:47 to 04:43 | 18.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:53 to 01:53 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:05 to 04:05 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:40 to 04:40 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:48 to 01:48 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:14 to 04:14 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:39 to 05:39 | 0.0% |
| Driver Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:41 | 00:00 | 04:29 -00:48 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:12 | 03:41 | 04:24 -00:12 | 04:29 -00:48 |
| Running 2 | 05:23 | 07:53 | 04:51 +00:32 | 08:53 -01:00 |
| Sled Push | 01:53 | 13:16 | 02:51 -00:58 | 13:44 -00:28 |
| Running 3 | 05:49 | 15:09 | 05:15 +00:34 | 16:35 -01:26 |
| Sled Pull | 04:05 | 20:58 | 04:45 -00:40 | 21:50 -00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:50 | 25:03 | 05:14 +00:36 | 26:35 -01:32 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:47 | 30:53 | 05:02 +00:45 | 31:49 -00:56 |
| Running 5 | 05:58 | 36:40 | 05:23 +00:35 | 36:51 -00:11 |
| Rowing | 04:40 | 42:38 | 04:45 -00:05 | 42:14 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:46 | 47:18 | 05:16 +00:30 | 46:59 +00:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:48 | 53:04 | 02:07 -00:19 | 52:15 +00:49 |
| Running 7 | 05:55 | 54:52 | 05:15 +00:40 | 54:22 +00:30 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:14 | 01:00:47 | 04:54 -00:40 | 59:37 +01:10 |
| Running 8 | 06:47 | 01:05:01 | 05:47 +01:00 | 01:04:31 +00:30 |
| Wall Balls | 05:39 | 01:11:48 | 06:15 -00:36 | 01:10:18 +01:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:44 | 01:23:04 | 06:31 -00:47 | 01:23:04 |
Mark Driver's performance in the 2024 Manchester HYROX event showcased a notable blend of strengths and areas for improvement. He finished in the top 56% of all athletes and in the top 53% of his age group (40-44). One of the most significant aspects of his performance was his strength exercises, where he was consistently faster than the average in all strength segments like Ski Erg, Sled Push, Sled Pull, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Wall Balls. This indicates his strength training is effective and he should continue to focus on these areas.
However, his total running time was 03:21 slower than the average, suggesting that his running speed and endurance need to be enhanced. Especially, his running time seemed to slow down as the race progressed, indicating a potential endurance issue. His best running lap was 00:05:23, demonstrating his potential when fresh and rested.
Based on Mark's performance, a few race strategies could be beneficial for future events:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lepage Alexandre | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:23:16 | |
| Resio Michele | 2024 Turin | 01:22:36 | |
| Chaves Paulo | 2023 Valencia | 01:22:56 | |
| Scholtz Ryno | 2024 Perth | 01:22:43 | |
| Clarkson Matthew | 2023 London | 01:23:33 | |
| Sroka Krzysztof | 2024 Poznan | 01:23:25 | |
| Lauer Frank | 2023 Köln | 01:23:02 | |
| Doak Callum | 2023 London | 01:22:42 | |
| Rousing Andreas | 2024 Malaga | 01:22:37 | |
| Whiting Michael | 2024 London | 01:23:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Glasgow | 01:42:32 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:42:04 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
