Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement.
For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of
843 similar athletes.
This chart provides a visual summary of the race performance, displaying percentile rankings for all running and workout segments. You can quickly see the strength and the weakness of the athlete.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Run, Baby, Run!
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
Based on 843 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Station Showdown
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Based on 843 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Fast, slow, or steady?
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
Based on 843 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
Expected Finish Time
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station.
Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
Spread of Splits Time
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Percentile based on all the athletes who competed in Hyrox Men
Improvement Plan
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is
to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst.
It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance.
Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of
07:47.
Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
Based on 843 athletes with similar finish time in Hyrox Men
A word from RoxCoach - Your AI Powered Trainer
Overall Performance:
Tim AshEdwards' performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event showed a combination of strengths and areas for improvement. His overall ranking placed him in the top 59% of all athletes, and in the top 64% of his age group (35-39). Notably, Tim showed a propensity for strength-based exercises, outperforming the average in the Ski Erg, Sled Push/Pull, Rowing, Farmers Carry, Sandbag Lunges, and Roxzone segments. However, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting a potential area for improvement. His pacing in the running segments was generally consistent, although he started slower in the first segment and gradually improved his times. This pacing strategy may indicate a conservative start to manage his energy levels, but it could be optimized to improve his overall ranking.
Segments to Improve:
Running: As Tim's total running time was slower than average, this segment requires focused attention. To improve his running speed, Tim can incorporate interval training into his routine, alternating between high-intensity running and recovery periods. Specific drills might include hill repeats or sprint intervals. Additionally, incorporating strength training for lower body muscle groups could enhance his power and speed.
Burpees Broad Jump: Tim's performance in this segment was significantly slower than average. This suggests a need to improve both his burpee efficiency and his broad jump distance. Plyometric exercises, like box jumps or jumping lunges, can help develop explosive power needed for the broad jump. For the burpees, practicing the movement regularly can improve technique and speed.
Wall Balls: Another slower segment for Tim was the wall balls. This could be due to fatigue, strength, or technique issues. Training with medicine ball exercises can improve strength, while specific wall ball drills can enhance technique. It may also be beneficial to work on squat strength and endurance, which are crucial for this exercise.
Race Strategies:
In future races, Tim might consider adjusting his pacing strategy. Instead of starting slower in the running segments, he could aim to push harder at the beginning when energy levels are at their highest. Additionally, focusing on swift and efficient transitions between exercises can shave off valuable seconds from his total time. Given his strength in the strength-based segments, Tim might consider conserving energy during these exercises to allocate more effort to the running segments where he has room for improvement.