Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ruijmgaart Max's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ruijmgaart Max's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ruijmgaart Max's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ruijmgaart Max's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:16 | 47:56 to 45:40 | 63.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:15 | 07:12 to 05:57 | 34.9% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 05:00 to 04:58 | 0.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:02 | 02:21 to 02:19 | 0.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:30 to 04:30 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:20 to 02:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 05:25 to 05:25 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 06:44 to 06:44 | 0.0% |
| Ruijmgaart Max | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:00 | 00:00 | 04:59 -00:59 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:30 | 04:00 | 04:35 -00:05 | 04:59 -00:59 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:30 | 05:23 +00:08 | 09:34 -01:04 |
| Sled Push | 02:20 | 14:01 | 03:12 -00:52 | 14:57 -00:56 |
| Running 3 | 05:54 | 16:21 | 05:53 +00:01 | 18:09 -01:48 |
| Sled Pull | 04:41 | 22:15 | 05:31 -00:50 | 24:02 -01:47 |
| Running 4 | 06:00 | 26:56 | 05:52 +00:08 | 29:33 -02:37 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:12 | 32:56 | 06:11 +01:01 | 35:25 -02:29 |
| Running 5 | 06:31 | 40:08 | 06:04 +00:27 | 41:36 -01:28 |
| Rowing | 05:00 | 46:39 | 05:01 -00:01 | 47:40 -01:01 |
| Running 6 | 06:08 | 51:39 | 05:54 +00:14 | 52:41 -01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 57:47 | 02:25 -00:04 | 58:35 -00:48 |
| Running 7 | 06:21 | 01:00:08 | 05:53 +00:28 | 01:01:00 -00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:25 | 01:06:29 | 05:48 -00:23 | 01:06:53 -00:24 |
| Running 8 | 07:34 | 01:11:54 | 06:46 +00:48 | 01:12:41 -00:47 |
| Wall Balls | 06:44 | 01:19:28 | 07:26 -00:42 | 01:19:27 +00:01 |
| Roxzone | 08:50 | 01:34:55 | 08:02 +00:48 | 01:34:55 |
Max Ruijmgaart demonstrated a commendable performance in the 2024 Amsterdam Hyrox race, placing in the top 50% overall and top 56% in his age group. His overall time was 01:34:55, showing a strong competitive edge. Notably, Max's running performance was slightly slower than average, with a total running time of 00:47:56, suggesting he has a more strength-oriented profile. His initial pace was aggressive, starting significantly faster than average in Running 1, but this early speed did not sustain, as seen in slower times in the later running segments. Max's strength is evident with exceptional performances in the Sled Push and Sled Pull, indicating his potential in strength-focused exercises.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| McConnell Rory | 2024 Manchester | 01:34:41 | |
| Vos Jochem | 2023 Maastricht European Championships | 01:35:11 | |
| Hiebner Martin | 2022 Wien | 01:35:05 | |
| Yip Scott | 2023 Hong Kong | 01:35:13 | |
| Coltman Mark | 2024 Berlin | 01:34:33 | |
| Malkera Mohammad | 2023 London | 01:34:42 | |
| Kuijpers John | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:35:04 | |
| Thul Lars | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:35:11 | |
| Sprague Jon | 2023 Manchester | 01:35:06 | |
| Read Dan | 2023 London | 01:34:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Rotterdam | 01:40:52 | |
| 2024 Maastricht | 01:34:23 | |
| 2024 Rotterdam | 01:37:34 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
