Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Bordeaux using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Echeberria Nerea's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Echeberria Nerea's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Echeberria Nerea's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Echeberria Nerea's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:17. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:31 | 06:24 to 04:53 | 46.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:20 to 04:42 | 19.3% |
| Run Total | 00:15 | 41:39 to 41:24 | 7.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:14 | 03:58 to 03:44 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:26 to 02:14 | 6.1% |
| Rowing | 00:10 | 05:13 to 05:03 | 5.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:56 to 04:49 | 3.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:06 | 04:06 to 04:00 | 3.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:04 | 02:00 to 01:56 | 2.0% |
| Echeberria Nerea | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:04 | 00:00 | 04:47 +01:17 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:56 | 06:04 | 04:57 -00:01 | 04:47 +01:17 |
| Running 2 | 05:08 | 11:00 | 05:08 +00:00 | 09:44 +01:16 |
| Sled Push | 02:26 | 16:08 | 02:32 -00:06 | 14:52 +01:16 |
| Running 3 | 05:11 | 18:34 | 05:24 -00:13 | 17:24 +01:10 |
| Sled Pull | 05:20 | 23:45 | 05:13 +00:07 | 22:48 +00:57 |
| Running 4 | 05:21 | 29:05 | 05:25 -00:04 | 28:01 +01:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:24 | 34:26 | 05:21 +01:03 | 33:26 +01:00 |
| Running 5 | 05:02 | 40:50 | 05:32 -00:30 | 38:47 +02:03 |
| Rowing | 05:13 | 45:52 | 05:12 +00:01 | 44:19 +01:33 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 51:05 | 05:27 -00:32 | 49:31 +01:34 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:00 | 56:00 | 02:07 -00:07 | 54:58 +01:02 |
| Running 7 | 04:56 | 58:00 | 05:24 -00:28 | 57:05 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:06 | 01:02:56 | 04:19 -00:13 | 01:02:29 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 05:05 | 01:07:02 | 05:44 -00:39 | 01:06:48 +00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 03:58 | 01:12:07 | 04:19 -00:21 | 01:12:32 -00:25 |
| Roxzone | 06:52 | 01:22:51 | 06:00 +00:52 | 01:22:51 |
Nerea Echeberria's performance in the 2024 Bordeaux HYROX race places her impressively within the top 7% of her age group, showcasing her exceptional fitness and competitive spirit. Her overall time of 01:22:51 is commendable, with a total running time of 00:41:39, which is 01:40 faster than average, indicating a strong runner profile. Despite her strengths, there are areas where Nerea could focus her training to improve her overall rank and time. Notably, her pacing at the start was slower than average, but she consistently gained momentum, suggesting room for improvement in pacing strategy. Her profile leans towards a hybrid, excelling in both running and strength, but with a slight edge in running.
By focusing on these targeted training strategies and race day tactics, Nerea Echeberria has the potential to significantly improve her performance in future HYROX races. With dedicated training and a strategic approach, she can turn identified weaknesses into strengths and achieve even higher rankings in her age group and overall.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Forde Anna | 2024 Birmingham | 01:23:00 | |
| Triebess Sabrina | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:23:12 | |
| Tangney Tara | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:24 | |
| Brückner Kerstin | 2020 Hannover | 01:23:04 | |
| Shefferd Amy | 2024 Birmingham | 01:22:38 | |
| Eddinger Missy | 2024 Fort Lauderdale | 01:22:36 | |
| Tulowitzki Inka | 2020 Hannover | 01:23:13 | |
| Quarz Elena | 2023 Stuttgart | 01:22:31 | |
| Doyle Emily | 2024 Berlin | 01:22:49 | |
| Parnell Nicole | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:35 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
