Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Melbourne using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire D'Arcangelo Marco's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights D'Arcangelo Marco's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the D'Arcangelo Marco's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve D'Arcangelo Marco's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:51. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:00 | 48:18 to 46:18 | 41.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:52 | 07:20 to 05:28 | 38.5% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:59 | 06:42 to 05:43 | 20.3% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:32 to 04:32 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:42 to 02:42 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 05:43 to 05:43 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:59 to 04:59 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:22 to 02:22 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:36 to 05:36 | 0.0% |
| D'Arcangelo Marco | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 05:00 -00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:55 | 04:37 -00:05 | 05:00 -00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:18 | 09:27 | 05:26 -00:08 | 09:37 -00:10 |
| Sled Push | 02:42 | 14:45 | 03:15 -00:33 | 15:03 -00:18 |
| Running 3 | 05:31 | 17:27 | 05:59 -00:28 | 18:18 -00:51 |
| Sled Pull | 07:20 | 22:58 | 05:39 +01:41 | 24:17 -01:19 |
| Running 4 | 05:30 | 30:18 | 05:56 -00:26 | 29:56 +00:22 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:43 | 35:48 | 06:21 -00:38 | 35:52 -00:04 |
| Running 5 | 05:54 | 41:31 | 06:10 -00:16 | 42:13 -00:42 |
| Rowing | 04:59 | 47:25 | 05:03 -00:04 | 48:23 -00:58 |
| Running 6 | 05:45 | 52:24 | 05:59 -00:14 | 53:26 -01:02 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:22 | 58:09 | 02:25 -00:03 | 59:25 -01:16 |
| Running 7 | 08:25 | 01:00:31 | 05:57 +02:28 | 01:01:50 -01:19 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:42 | 01:08:56 | 05:55 +00:47 | 01:07:47 +01:09 |
| Running 8 | 07:04 | 01:15:38 | 06:52 +00:12 | 01:13:42 +01:56 |
| Wall Balls | 05:36 | 01:22:42 | 07:43 -02:07 | 01:20:34 +02:08 |
| Roxzone | 08:23 | 01:36:33 | 08:16 +00:07 | 01:36:33 |
Marco D'Arcangelo delivered a commendable performance at the 2024 Melbourne Hyrox event, placing in the top 46% overall and 47% in his age group. His finish time of 01:36:33 highlights his competitive nature. Notably, Marco's strength seems to lie more in the strength-based exercises, as evidenced by his significantly faster-than-average performance in the Sled Push and Wall Balls. However, his total running time was slightly slower than average, indicating that his running could benefit from targeted improvements.
Marco's initial pacing suggests that he started strong, with his first few running segments faster than average. However, his running performance declined particularly in the later segments, such as Running 7 and Running 8, indicating possible fatigue or a need for better stamina management. This suggests a hybrid athlete profile with potential in both running and strength, but with room for improvement in endurance and running consistency.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Quinn Paul | 2024 Madrid | 01:36:46 | |
| Patel Mitesh | 2024 Birmingham | 01:36:36 | |
| Fitzgerald John | 2023 Dublin | 01:36:18 | |
| Bertov Oskar | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:36:16 | |
| Lewis Ash | 2022 Birmingham | 01:36:16 | |
| Nieland Alexander | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:36:42 | |
| Entchelmeier Hendrik | 2022 Berlin | 01:36:44 | |
| Brabanski Oskar | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:36:17 | |
| Ingardona Michael | 2022 Chicago | 01:36:53 | |
| Bessant Ian | 2024 London | 01:36:43 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
