Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Cape Town using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Malan Andries Jacobus's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Malan Andries Jacobus's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Malan Andries Jacobus's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Malan Andries Jacobus's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:38. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:09 | 46:18 to 41:09 | 91.4% |
| Wall Balls | 00:29 | 06:24 to 05:55 | 8.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:02 to 04:02 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:09 to 02:09 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:39 to 04:39 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:33 to 01:33 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:42 to 03:42 | 0.0% |
| Malan Andries Jacobus | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:39 | 00:00 | 04:34 +00:05 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:02 | 04:39 | 04:25 -00:23 | 04:34 +00:05 |
| Running 2 | 05:10 | 08:41 | 04:53 +00:17 | 08:59 -00:18 |
| Sled Push | 02:09 | 13:51 | 02:52 -00:43 | 13:52 -00:01 |
| Running 3 | 05:53 | 16:00 | 05:19 +00:34 | 16:44 -00:44 |
| Sled Pull | 03:42 | 21:53 | 04:50 -01:08 | 22:03 -00:10 |
| Running 4 | 06:02 | 25:35 | 05:18 +00:44 | 26:53 -01:18 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:25 | 31:37 | 05:12 -00:47 | 32:11 -00:34 |
| Running 5 | 06:32 | 36:02 | 05:28 +01:04 | 37:23 -01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:39 | 42:34 | 04:47 -00:08 | 42:51 -00:17 |
| Running 6 | 05:06 | 47:13 | 05:19 -00:13 | 47:38 -00:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:33 | 52:19 | 02:08 -00:35 | 52:57 -00:38 |
| Running 7 | 05:29 | 53:52 | 05:18 +00:11 | 55:05 -01:13 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:42 | 59:21 | 04:59 -01:17 | 01:00:23 -01:02 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:03:03 | 05:53 +01:37 | 01:05:22 -02:19 |
| Wall Balls | 06:24 | 01:10:33 | 06:19 +00:05 | 01:11:15 -00:42 |
| Roxzone | 07:25 | 01:24:13 | 06:39 +00:46 | 01:24:13 |
Andries Jacobus Malan delivered a commendable performance, finishing in the top 25% of all participants and top 34% in his age group. Despite a strong showing in several strength-based events, his overall running time was notably slower than average, indicating a need for improvement in this area. The initial running segments suggest that Andries may have started too quickly, as his performance declined progressively, particularly noticeable from Running 4 onward. His profile leans towards strength, with exceptional performances in strength-based stations like the Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Farmers Carry, indicating a robust strength foundation. However, a balanced focus on running efficiency and transition speed could significantly enhance his race outcomes.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferris Sebastian | 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:16 | |
| Ziehl Marlon | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:24:34 | |
| Weir Robbie | 2023 Glasgow | 01:23:50 | |
| Greyling Berno | 2024 Cape Town | 01:23:53 | |
| Barnett Craig | 2024 Birmingham | 01:24:39 | |
| Roades Paul | 2024 Perth | 01:24:31 | |
| Bos Wim | 2024 Rotterdam | 01:24:13 | |
| Wong Nicholas | 2024 Singapore | 01:24:11 | |
| Weigt Tobias | 2023 München | 01:24:29 | |
| Waymark Jack | 2022 Birmingham | 01:23:47 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
