Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 Chicago using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Grogan Tim's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Grogan Tim's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Grogan Tim's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Grogan Tim's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:49. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:31 | 45:00 to 41:29 | 60.5% |
| Sled Push | 01:33 | 04:14 to 02:41 | 26.6% |
| Sled Pull | 00:19 | 04:55 to 04:36 | 5.4% |
| Rowing | 00:19 | 05:02 to 04:43 | 5.4% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:07 | 02:09 to 02:02 | 2.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:59 to 03:59 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 03:47 to 03:47 | 0.0% |
| Grogan Tim | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:01 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 05:01 | 04:26 -00:06 | 04:35 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 05:20 | 09:21 | 04:57 +00:23 | 09:01 +00:20 |
| Sled Push | 04:14 | 14:41 | 02:54 +01:20 | 13:58 +00:43 |
| Running 3 | 05:44 | 18:55 | 05:23 +00:21 | 16:52 +02:03 |
| Sled Pull | 04:55 | 24:39 | 04:56 -00:01 | 22:15 +02:24 |
| Running 4 | 05:38 | 29:34 | 05:21 +00:17 | 27:11 +02:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:32 | 35:12 | 05:18 -01:46 | 32:32 +02:40 |
| Running 5 | 05:43 | 38:44 | 05:31 +00:12 | 37:50 +00:54 |
| Rowing | 05:02 | 44:27 | 04:49 +00:13 | 43:21 +01:06 |
| Running 6 | 05:22 | 49:29 | 05:23 -00:01 | 48:10 +01:19 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:09 | 54:51 | 02:11 -00:02 | 53:33 +01:18 |
| Running 7 | 05:31 | 57:00 | 05:22 +00:09 | 55:44 +01:16 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:59 | 01:02:31 | 05:06 -01:07 | 01:01:06 +01:25 |
| Running 8 | 06:44 | 01:06:30 | 05:58 +00:46 | 01:06:12 +00:18 |
| Wall Balls | 03:47 | 01:13:14 | 06:31 -02:44 | 01:12:10 +01:04 |
| Roxzone | 08:34 | 01:25:28 | 06:47 +01:47 | 01:25:28 |
Based on the splits analysis, Tim's running performance was slightly slower than the average, with running segments 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 showing a slower pace compared to the average. However, he performed exceptionally well in the Burpees Broad Jump and Wall Balls segments, finishing faster than the average.
By implementing these race strategies and focusing on the identified areas of improvement, Tim Grogan can enhance his performance in future Hyrox races and continue to excel in his age group.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Rikkert Johan | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:25:00 | |
| Folliot Tim | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:33 | |
| Barretto Topher | 2022 Hong Kong | 01:25:05 | |
| Keenan Odena Michael Joseph | 2022 Maastricht | 01:25:21 | |
| Ballinger Peter | 2022 London | 01:25:28 | |
| Carvell Rob | 2023 London | 01:25:21 | |
| Trethowan Joel | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:31 | |
| Colebatch Paul | 2023 Manchester | 01:25:05 | |
| Van De Casteel Alex | 2023 Rotterdam | 01:25:24 | |
| Donald Tom | 2023 London | 01:25:12 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Dallas | 01:18:01 | |
| 2024 Houston | 01:13:24 | |
| 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:08:58 | |
| 2022 Chicago | 01:22:52 | |
| 2023 Chicago | 01:14:22 | |
| 2023 Chicago - North American Open Championship | 01:16:44 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
