Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Scanlkn Connall's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Scanlkn Connall's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Scanlkn Connall's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Scanlkn Connall's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 03:19. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:21 | 06:00 to 04:39 | 40.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:06 | 06:46 to 05:40 | 33.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:37 | 04:59 to 04:22 | 18.6% |
| Sled Push | 00:12 | 02:45 to 02:33 | 6.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:03 | 04:21 to 04:18 | 1.5% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:35 to 04:35 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:03 to 04:03 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:52 to 39:52 | 0.0% |
| Scanlkn Connall | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:37 | 00:00 | 04:30 +01:07 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 05:37 | 04:23 -00:02 | 04:30 +01:07 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 09:58 | 04:48 -00:11 | 08:53 +01:05 |
| Sled Push | 02:45 | 14:35 | 02:47 -00:02 | 13:41 +00:54 |
| Running 3 | 05:03 | 17:20 | 05:12 -00:09 | 16:28 +00:52 |
| Sled Pull | 04:59 | 22:23 | 04:41 +00:18 | 21:40 +00:43 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 27:22 | 05:10 -00:09 | 26:21 +01:01 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:00 | 32:23 | 04:59 +01:01 | 31:31 +00:52 |
| Running 5 | 05:01 | 38:23 | 05:20 -00:19 | 36:30 +01:53 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 43:24 | 04:44 -00:09 | 41:50 +01:34 |
| Running 6 | 04:56 | 47:59 | 05:13 -00:17 | 46:34 +01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 52:55 | 02:07 -00:21 | 51:47 +01:08 |
| Running 7 | 04:48 | 54:41 | 05:11 -00:23 | 53:54 +00:47 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:03 | 59:29 | 04:52 -00:49 | 59:05 +00:24 |
| Running 8 | 04:53 | 01:03:32 | 05:42 -00:49 | 01:03:57 -00:25 |
| Wall Balls | 06:46 | 01:08:25 | 06:09 +00:37 | 01:09:39 -01:14 |
| Roxzone | 07:07 | 01:22:10 | 06:22 +00:45 | 01:22:10 |
Connall Scanlkn proved himself to be a strong competitor in the Madrid 2024 Hyrox race. Finishing in the Top 26% of athletes overall and in the Top 28% of his age group shows a high level of fitness and dedication. His overall time of 01:22:10 is commendable, especially considering his total running time of 00:39:52, which is 01:28 faster than the average time.
The consistent pace and faster times in running segments show that Connall has a runner's profile. It's also noticeable that he started slower in the first running segment but gradually improved his speed, indicating a well-planned pacing strategy.
Based on his performance, Connall should consider the following strategies for future races:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ruffa Christian | 2024 Milan | 01:22:20 | |
| Barnes Jamie | 2024 Glasgow | 01:22:23 | |
| Gauthier Michel | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:22:34 | |
| Fisher John | 2024 Dublin | 01:22:38 | |
| Lorenzini Samuele | 2024 Milan | 01:22:36 | |
| Kabel Tobias | 2024 Hamburg | 01:21:44 | |
| Haferkorn Henry | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:22:30 | |
| Goldsworthy Luke | 2024 Brisbane | 01:21:56 | |
| Wherrit Ross | 2024 Manchester | 01:22:40 | |
| Mcenery Christopher | 2023 New York | 01:22:04 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
