Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Madrid using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 632 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Prendergast Ralph's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Prendergast Ralph's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Prendergast Ralph's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Prendergast Ralph's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:17 | 54:48 to 52:31 | 50.6% |
| Sled Pull | 02:14 | 08:52 to 06:38 | 49.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:51 to 03:51 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 07:23 to 07:23 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:22 to 05:22 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:28 to 02:28 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 06:53 to 06:53 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 07:35 to 07:35 | 0.0% |
| Prendergast Ralph | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:44 | 00:00 | 05:33 +01:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:37 | 06:44 | 04:50 -00:13 | 05:33 +01:11 |
| Running 2 | 05:44 | 11:21 | 06:03 -00:19 | 10:23 +00:58 |
| Sled Push | 03:51 | 17:05 | 03:45 +00:06 | 16:26 +00:39 |
| Running 3 | 06:07 | 20:56 | 06:47 -00:40 | 20:11 +00:45 |
| Sled Pull | 08:52 | 27:03 | 06:36 +02:16 | 26:58 +00:05 |
| Running 4 | 06:25 | 35:55 | 06:46 -00:21 | 33:34 +02:21 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:23 | 42:20 | 07:42 -00:19 | 40:20 +02:00 |
| Running 5 | 06:57 | 49:43 | 07:08 -00:11 | 48:02 +01:41 |
| Rowing | 05:22 | 56:40 | 05:23 -00:01 | 55:10 +01:30 |
| Running 6 | 06:23 | 01:02:02 | 06:48 -00:25 | 01:00:33 +01:29 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 01:08:25 | 02:46 -00:18 | 01:07:21 +01:04 |
| Running 7 | 06:09 | 01:10:53 | 06:52 -00:43 | 01:10:07 +00:46 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 06:53 | 01:17:02 | 07:13 -00:20 | 01:16:59 +00:03 |
| Running 8 | 10:23 | 01:23:55 | 08:37 +01:46 | 01:24:12 -00:17 |
| Wall Balls | 07:35 | 01:34:18 | 09:24 -01:49 | 01:32:49 +01:29 |
| Roxzone | 10:39 | 01:52:25 | 10:12 +00:27 | 01:52:25 |
Ralph Prendergast delivered a commendable performance, finishing in the top 65% of all athletes and top 71% of his age group, demonstrating his competitiveness in the 35-39 age group category. Despite a slow start in the first running segment, he managed to recover speed in the subsequent running sections, showcasing a strong resilience and pacing strategy. His total running time is 12 seconds faster than the average, suggesting that Ralph has a runner profile. His performance was particularly noteworthy in the Wall Balls section, where he was significantly faster than the average.
There are a few areas where Ralph could improve to enhance his overall performance:
Implementing the following strategies could assist Ralph in improving his race performance:
In summary, while Ralph has shown great potential and resilience, there is room for improvement. By focusing on the identified areas and implementing the suggested strategies, Ralph has the potential to significantly improve his performance in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Leitz Nicolas | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:51:58 | |
| Tucker Iain | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:52:50 | |
| Neeteson Joey | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:52:04 | |
| Bond Charlie | 2023 London | 01:52:36 | |
| White Jamie | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:52:29 | |
| Monin Hugo | 2023 Paris | 01:52:35 | |
| Haude Vincent | 2023 Köln | 01:51:58 | |
| Bahranipoor Abe | 2024 Dallas | 01:52:51 | |
| Cruz Efren | 2024 Mexico City | 01:52:53 | |
| Chesterman Sam | 2024 Manchester | 01:52:36 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
