Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Sydney using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Pate Matt's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Pate Matt's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Pate Matt's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Pate Matt's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:53. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 05:58 | 47:57 to 41:59 | 75.7% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:02 | 06:07 to 05:05 | 13.1% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:53 | 05:47 to 04:54 | 11.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:20 to 04:20 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:54 to 01:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:07 to 03:07 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:37 to 04:37 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 05:35 to 05:35 | 0.0% |
| Pate Matt | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:21 | 00:00 | 04:39 -00:18 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:21 | 04:27 -00:07 | 04:39 -00:18 |
| Running 2 | 05:31 | 08:41 | 05:00 +00:31 | 09:06 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 01:54 | 14:12 | 02:56 -01:02 | 14:06 +00:06 |
| Running 3 | 06:00 | 16:06 | 05:26 +00:34 | 17:02 -00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 03:07 | 22:06 | 05:00 -01:53 | 22:28 -00:22 |
| Running 4 | 06:05 | 25:13 | 05:26 +00:39 | 27:28 -02:15 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:07 | 31:18 | 05:22 +00:45 | 32:54 -01:36 |
| Running 5 | 06:17 | 37:25 | 05:35 +00:42 | 38:16 -00:51 |
| Rowing | 04:37 | 43:42 | 04:50 -00:13 | 43:51 -00:09 |
| Running 6 | 06:11 | 48:19 | 05:28 +00:43 | 48:41 -00:22 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 54:30 | 02:12 -00:28 | 54:09 +00:21 |
| Running 7 | 06:00 | 56:14 | 05:26 +00:34 | 56:21 -00:07 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:47 | 01:02:14 | 05:08 +00:39 | 01:01:47 +00:27 |
| Running 8 | 07:36 | 01:08:01 | 06:04 +01:32 | 01:06:55 +01:06 |
| Wall Balls | 05:35 | 01:15:37 | 06:34 -00:59 | 01:12:59 +02:38 |
| Roxzone | 05:24 | 01:26:28 | 06:55 -01:31 | 01:26:28 |
Matt Pate's performance at the 2024 Sydney Hyrox event showcased a strong balance between strength and transition efficiency, with notable achievements in strength-intensive segments like the Sled Push and Sled Pull, where he ranked in the top 5% and 1%, respectively. However, his total running time was 4:31 slower than the average, indicating that running is an area for improvement. His pacing strategy suggests he may have started slightly too fast, as shown by his faster-than-average Running 1 split and progressively slower times in subsequent running segments. Overall, Matt's profile leans towards strength, but enhancing his running endurance and speed could elevate his overall race performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Smith Neil | 2024 Birmingham | 01:26:52 | |
| Danilovich Boris | 2021 New York | 01:26:36 | |
| Dürselen Frank | 2024 Köln | 01:26:05 | |
| Séhédic Florian | 2023 Paris | 01:26:41 | |
| Mcdonald Brian | 2024 Dublin | 01:26:04 | |
| Galino Cyril | 2024 Marseille | 01:26:00 | |
| Larrubia Francisco | 2023 Stockholm | 01:26:07 | |
| Morris Greg | 2020 Chicago | 01:26:33 | |
| Cotterhill Niall | 2024 Glasgow | 01:25:58 | |
| Campbell Stuart | 2024 Manchester | 01:26:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
