Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Houghton Mathew's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Houghton Mathew's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Houghton Mathew's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Houghton Mathew's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 05:43. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:21 | 07:40 to 05:19 | 41.1% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:33 | 07:10 to 05:37 | 27.1% |
| Sled Push | 01:09 | 04:08 to 02:59 | 20.1% |
| Wall Balls | 00:36 | 07:21 to 06:45 | 10.5% |
| Run Total | 00:04 | 44:21 to 44:17 | 1.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:25 to 04:25 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:42 to 04:42 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:43 to 04:43 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:44 to 01:44 | 0.0% |
| Houghton Mathew | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:13 | 00:00 | 04:48 +00:25 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:25 | 05:13 | 04:33 -00:08 | 04:48 +00:25 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 09:38 | 05:16 -00:13 | 09:21 +00:17 |
| Sled Push | 04:08 | 14:41 | 03:08 +01:00 | 14:37 +00:04 |
| Running 3 | 05:37 | 18:49 | 05:46 -00:09 | 17:45 +01:04 |
| Sled Pull | 04:42 | 24:26 | 05:23 -00:41 | 23:31 +00:55 |
| Running 4 | 05:14 | 29:08 | 05:44 -00:30 | 28:54 +00:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:10 | 34:22 | 05:57 +01:13 | 34:38 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:23 | 41:32 | 05:56 -00:33 | 40:35 +00:57 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 46:55 | 04:58 -00:15 | 46:31 +00:24 |
| Running 6 | 05:23 | 51:38 | 05:47 -00:24 | 51:29 +00:09 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:44 | 57:01 | 02:21 -00:37 | 57:16 -00:15 |
| Running 7 | 05:24 | 58:45 | 05:44 -00:20 | 59:37 -00:52 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 07:40 | 01:04:09 | 05:34 +02:06 | 01:05:21 -01:12 |
| Running 8 | 07:09 | 01:11:49 | 06:31 +00:38 | 01:10:55 +00:54 |
| Wall Balls | 07:21 | 01:18:58 | 07:13 +00:08 | 01:17:26 +01:32 |
| Roxzone | 06:11 | 01:32:20 | 07:41 -01:30 | 01:32:20 |
Mathew's total running time of 00:44:21 was 20 seconds slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to focus more on his overall fitness and transition time to improve his performance in the race. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:05:03, indicating that he has good speed and endurance.
Additionally, Mathew should strategize his transitions between segments to minimize time spent in the roxzone. Practicing quick and efficient transitions during his training sessions will help him save valuable time during the race.
Overall, Mathew Houghton has shown great potential in the HYROX race. By implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, he can further improve his performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mombrei Felix | 2021 Hamburg | 01:32:49 | |
| Schnur Christian | 2019 Hannover | 01:32:31 | |
| Reiser Matthias | 2023 München | 01:32:35 | |
| Aro Arran | 2024 Birmingham | 01:32:02 | |
| Robillard Clément | 2024 Paris | 01:32:38 | |
| Neenan Chris | 2024 Manchester | 01:32:48 | |
| Fortunato Antony | 2024 Paris | 01:31:58 | |
| Stahl Alexander | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:32:38 | |
| Szczuka Paweł | 2024 Katowice | 01:32:25 | |
| Stokkenes Haakon | 2024 Vienna - European Championship | 01:32:21 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2022 Birmingham | 01:47:30 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:52:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
