Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Chicago Navy Pier using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Rizzo Mark's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Rizzo Mark's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Rizzo Mark's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Rizzo Mark's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:36. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 01:51 | 40:09 to 38:18 | 40.2% |
| Sled Pull | 01:14 | 05:18 to 04:04 | 26.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 01:10 | 05:24 to 04:14 | 25.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:10 | 02:32 to 02:22 | 3.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:08 | 04:21 to 04:13 | 2.9% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:35 to 04:32 | 1.1% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:46 to 03:46 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:46 to 04:46 | 0.0% |
| Rizzo Mark | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:36 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:43 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:21 | 03:36 | 04:20 +00:01 | 04:19 -00:43 |
| Running 2 | 04:32 | 07:57 | 04:37 -00:05 | 08:39 -00:42 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 12:29 | 02:40 -00:08 | 13:16 -00:47 |
| Running 3 | 05:20 | 15:01 | 05:00 +00:20 | 15:56 -00:55 |
| Sled Pull | 05:18 | 20:21 | 04:27 +00:51 | 20:56 -00:35 |
| Running 4 | 05:19 | 25:39 | 04:59 +00:20 | 25:23 +00:16 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:24 | 30:58 | 04:39 +00:45 | 30:22 +00:36 |
| Running 5 | 05:22 | 36:22 | 05:07 +00:15 | 35:01 +01:21 |
| Rowing | 04:35 | 41:44 | 04:39 -00:04 | 40:08 +01:36 |
| Running 6 | 05:13 | 46:19 | 05:01 +00:12 | 44:47 +01:32 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 51:32 | 02:01 -00:23 | 49:48 +01:44 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 53:10 | 05:00 +00:13 | 51:49 +01:21 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:46 | 58:23 | 04:34 -00:48 | 56:49 +01:34 |
| Running 8 | 05:37 | 01:02:09 | 05:26 +00:11 | 01:01:23 +00:46 |
| Wall Balls | 04:46 | 01:07:46 | 05:45 -00:59 | 01:06:49 +00:57 |
| Roxzone | 06:07 | 01:18:30 | 05:56 +00:11 | 01:18:30 |
Mark Rizzo showcased a commendable performance in the 2024 Chicago Navy Pier event, finishing in the top 13% of 1404 athletes and top 18% in his age category. Despite his overall run time being slower than average, he demonstrated his strength in the Farmers Carry and Sandbag Lunges segments where he was significantly faster than average, placing in the top 12% and 9% respectively. In the running segments, Mark had a strong start, finishing faster than average in Running 1 and 2. However, he was slower in the subsequent running segments, indicating that he may have started the race too quickly, leading to decreased performance in the latter part of the race. This suggests a need to improve his pacing strategies.
Based on his performance, Mark seems to exhibit a hybrid profile, excelling in both running and strength-based tasks. However, the overall slower running time suggests a need for additional focus on endurance training.
Maintaining a steady pace throughout the race can help Mark conserve energy for the later stages of the race. He should aim to start the running segments at a comfortable pace, gradually increasing speed as his body warms up. During strength-based tasks, Mark should focus on maintaining correct form to maximize efficiency and prevent injury. Implementing a targeted warmup routine before the race can also prepare his muscles for the upcoming challenge and improve overall performance. Finally, proper hydration and nutrition before and during the race can boost endurance and recovery.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Robinson Michael | 2024 London | 01:18:57 | |
| Barrs Elliot | 2024 London | 01:18:02 | |
| Bonillo Pérez Rubén | 2023 Madrid | 01:18:42 | |
| Koolen Peter | 2023 Köln | 01:18:33 | |
| Fitzpatrick Cian | 2024 Stockholm | 01:18:28 | |
| Kapicak Martin | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:18:42 | |
| Bayer Daniel | 2022 Frankfurt | 01:18:04 | |
| Affat Nicholas | 2024 Cape Town | 01:18:26 | |
| Lanigan Daniel | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:54 | |
| Evans Matt | 2022 Birmingham | 01:18:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
