Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Birmingham using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Shortall Roy's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Shortall Roy's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Shortall Roy's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Shortall Roy's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 02:31. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:51 | 05:28 to 04:37 | 33.8% |
| Sled Pull | 00:38 | 05:04 to 04:26 | 25.2% |
| Sled Push | 00:19 | 02:54 to 02:35 | 12.6% |
| Wall Balls | 00:16 | 06:01 to 05:45 | 10.6% |
| Ski Erg | 00:07 | 04:26 to 04:19 | 4.6% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:46 to 04:40 | 4.0% |
| Run Total | 00:06 | 40:35 to 40:29 | 4.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:05 | 02:03 to 01:58 | 3.3% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:03 | 04:46 to 04:43 | 2.0% |
| Shortall Roy | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:14 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:45 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:26 | 05:14 | 04:24 +00:02 | 04:29 +00:45 |
| Running 2 | 04:37 | 09:40 | 04:51 -00:14 | 08:53 +00:47 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 14:17 | 02:51 +00:03 | 13:44 +00:33 |
| Running 3 | 05:00 | 17:11 | 05:14 -00:14 | 16:35 +00:36 |
| Sled Pull | 05:04 | 22:11 | 04:45 +00:19 | 21:49 +00:22 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 27:15 | 05:13 -00:12 | 26:34 +00:41 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:46 | 32:16 | 05:03 -00:17 | 31:47 +00:29 |
| Running 5 | 05:15 | 37:02 | 05:23 -00:08 | 36:50 +00:12 |
| Rowing | 04:46 | 42:17 | 04:45 +00:01 | 42:13 +00:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:04 | 47:03 | 05:15 -00:11 | 46:58 +00:05 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:03 | 52:07 | 02:07 -00:04 | 52:13 -00:06 |
| Running 7 | 05:03 | 54:10 | 05:14 -00:11 | 54:20 -00:10 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:28 | 59:13 | 04:53 +00:35 | 59:34 -00:21 |
| Running 8 | 05:24 | 01:04:41 | 05:45 -00:21 | 01:04:27 +00:14 |
| Wall Balls | 06:01 | 01:10:05 | 06:14 -00:13 | 01:10:12 -00:07 |
| Roxzone | 06:56 | 01:22:54 | 06:28 +00:28 | 01:22:54 |
Roy Shortall's performance in the 2024 Birmingham HYROX event was commendable. His overall rank placed him in the top 28% of 4107 athletes and in his age group, he was within the top 32% of 811 athletes. Shortall's total running time was notably impressive, being 01:02 faster than the average running time. This suggests that Shortall has a strong runner profile, which he leveraged effectively during the race. However, his initial pacing in the first running segment was slower than average, which indicates a potential area to work on.
The following sections highlight the areas that require improvement and provide specific techniques for enhancement:
Implementing the following strategies can help improve race day performance:
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Lawrence Matthew | 2022 Chicago | 01:22:24 | |
| Fuller Thomas | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:22:48 | |
| Hunt Tim | 2024 London | 01:23:22 | |
| Brehm Christian | 2020 Karlsruhe | 01:22:47 | |
| Haase Sven | 2019 Leipzig | 01:22:41 | |
| Omahoney Callum | 2024 Dublin | 01:23:23 | |
| Teder Lee | 2023 London | 01:23:15 | |
| Barber James | 2022 Birmingham | 01:22:40 | |
| Story Joseph | 2024 Manchester | 01:23:11 | |
| Passicos Rudy | 2024 Marseille | 01:23:08 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Madrid | 01:35:02 | |
| 2024 London | 01:18:39 | |
| 2023 London | 01:27:52 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
