Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Amsterdam using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 539 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 08:39. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 08:17 (From 01:01:52 to 53:35) | 95.8% |
| Wall Balls | 00:22 (From 09:52 to 09:30) | 4.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:52 to 04:52) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 03:21 to 03:21) | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 (From 06:15 to 06:15) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 04:35 to 04:35) | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 (From 05:24 to 05:24) | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 (From 02:48 to 02:48) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 04:17 to 04:17) | 0.0% |
| Zeebregts Jarrel | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:08 | 00:00 | 05:34 -01:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:52 | 04:08 | 04:52 +00:00 | 05:34 -01:26 |
| Running 2 | 06:37 | 09:00 | 06:13 +00:24 | 10:26 -01:26 |
| Sled Push | 03:21 | 15:37 | 03:59 -00:38 | 16:39 -01:02 |
| Running 3 | 09:50 | 18:58 | 06:55 +02:55 | 20:38 -01:40 |
| Sled Pull | 06:15 | 28:48 | 06:57 -00:42 | 27:33 +01:15 |
| Running 4 | 08:12 | 35:03 | 06:54 +01:18 | 34:30 +00:33 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:35 | 43:15 | 08:02 -03:27 | 41:24 +01:51 |
| Running 5 | 07:29 | 47:50 | 07:16 +00:13 | 49:26 -01:36 |
| Rowing | 05:24 | 55:19 | 05:26 -00:02 | 56:42 -01:23 |
| Running 6 | 07:36 | 01:00:43 | 07:01 +00:35 | 01:02:08 -01:25 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:48 | 01:08:19 | 02:52 -00:04 | 01:09:09 -00:50 |
| Running 7 | 07:16 | 01:11:07 | 07:01 +00:15 | 01:12:01 -00:54 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:17 | 01:18:23 | 07:29 -03:12 | 01:19:02 -00:39 |
| Running 8 | 10:49 | 01:22:40 | 08:47 +02:02 | 01:26:31 -03:51 |
| Wall Balls | 09:52 | 01:33:29 | 09:45 +00:07 | 01:35:18 -01:49 |
| Roxzone | 12:30 | 01:55:42 | 10:39 +01:51 | 01:55:42 |
Jarrel's total running time of 01:01:52 was 09:02 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time to decrease the time spent in the roxzone. Additionally, his total running time was slower than average, suggesting that he may need to incorporate more running into his training regimen.
For Running 3, Jarrel was 02:53 slower than average. To improve this segment, he should incorporate interval training and hill sprints into his running routine. These types of workouts will help increase his speed and endurance.
In Running 8, Jarrel was 02:04 slower than average. To address this, he should work on increasing his overall strength and power. Exercises such as squats, deadlifts, and plyometric movements like box jumps can help improve his performance in this segment.
The Roxzone was another area where Jarrel lost significant time, being 01:46 slower than average. To improve in this segment, he should focus on improving his overall fitness and decreasing his transition time between exercises. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) workouts, circuit training, and practicing quick transitions between exercises can be beneficial.
In Running 4, Running 6, Running 2, Running 7, and Running 5, Jarrel lost time ranging from 00:18 to 01:21 slower than average. To address these segments, he should incorporate both strength and endurance training into his running routine. This can include tempo runs, fartlek training, and incorporating hills or stairs into his runs.
For Wall Balls, Jarrel was 00:14 slower than average. To improve this segment, he should focus on improving his upper body strength and explosiveness. Exercises such as medicine ball throws and kettlebell swings can help enhance his performance in this exercise.
Jarrel should also consider incorporating specific race strategies to optimize his performance. This can include breaking down the race into smaller, manageable sections and setting goals for each segment. Additionally, practicing transitions between exercises and simulating race conditions during training can help improve his overall race performance.
In conclusion, Jarrel Zeebregts had a commendable performance in the 2023 Amsterdam Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his overall fitness, decreasing transition times, and incorporating specific training strategies, he can enhance his performance in future races. Targeting the segments where he lost the most time and implementing the suggested training techniques will help him become a stronger and more efficient athlete.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Krüger PaulLuis | 2024 Hamburg | 01:55:20 | |
| Clancy James | 2022 Chicago | 01:55:15 | |
| Ten Broeke Gerben | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:55:24 | |
| Harren Kevin | 2024 Dublin | 01:55:56 | |
| McDonald Sean | 2024 New York | 01:55:36 | |
| Laird Balfour | 2024 Glasgow | 01:55:33 | |
| Chandiramani Manish Prem | 2023 Singapore | 01:55:41 | |
| Thomas Steffen | 2023 Hamburg | 01:56:04 | |
| Suárez Carrillo Aldair | 2024 Ciudad de Mexico | 01:56:03 | |
| Jelinek Michael | 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:56:02 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Zeebregts Jarrel
