Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Stockholm using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Moosbrugger Lukas's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Moosbrugger Lukas's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Moosbrugger Lukas's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Moosbrugger Lukas's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:35. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 02:13 | 07:38 to 05:25 | 48.4% |
| Run Total | 02:07 | 41:11 to 39:04 | 46.2% |
| Ski Erg | 00:09 | 04:24 to 04:15 | 3.3% |
| Sled Push | 00:06 | 02:32 to 02:26 | 2.2% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 03:53 to 03:53 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 02:50 to 02:50 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 04:34 to 04:34 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:46 to 01:46 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:12 to 04:12 | 0.0% |
| Moosbrugger Lukas | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:30 | 00:00 | 04:22 +01:08 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:24 | 05:30 | 04:21 +00:03 | 04:22 +01:08 |
| Running 2 | 04:30 | 09:54 | 04:42 -00:12 | 08:43 +01:11 |
| Sled Push | 02:32 | 14:24 | 02:43 -00:11 | 13:25 +00:59 |
| Running 3 | 05:07 | 16:56 | 05:05 +00:02 | 16:08 +00:48 |
| Sled Pull | 03:53 | 22:03 | 04:32 -00:39 | 21:13 +00:50 |
| Running 4 | 04:38 | 25:56 | 05:05 -00:27 | 25:45 +00:11 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:50 | 30:34 | 04:48 -01:58 | 30:50 -00:16 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 33:24 | 05:13 -00:06 | 35:38 -02:14 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 38:31 | 04:40 -00:06 | 40:51 -02:20 |
| Running 6 | 04:55 | 43:05 | 05:06 -00:11 | 45:31 -02:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:46 | 48:00 | 02:02 -00:16 | 50:37 -02:37 |
| Running 7 | 05:08 | 49:46 | 05:05 +00:03 | 52:39 -02:53 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:12 | 54:54 | 04:41 -00:29 | 57:44 -02:50 |
| Running 8 | 06:20 | 59:06 | 05:33 +00:47 | 01:02:25 -03:19 |
| Wall Balls | 07:38 | 01:05:26 | 05:55 +01:43 | 01:07:58 -02:32 |
| Roxzone | 07:03 | 01:20:00 | 06:07 +00:56 | 01:20:00 |
Lukas had a strong running performance, with his total running time of 00:41:11 being faster than the average. This indicates that he has a good running profile and should continue to focus on maintaining or improving his running endurance and speed. However, there were some areas where he lost time, particularly in the running 1 segment, where he was 01:16 slower than the average. This suggests that he may need to work on his pacing and consider starting the race at a slightly faster pace to avoid falling behind.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Keighery Thomas | 2024 Berlin | 01:19:36 | |
| Di Lenarda Lino | 2023 Rimini | 01:20:09 | |
| Edwards Keith | 2023 London | 01:20:20 | |
| Romanowski Patryk | 2024 Gdansk | 01:19:40 | |
| Katanik Jakub | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:20:05 | |
| Quan Jason | 2024 Malaga | 01:19:43 | |
| BodenTebbutt Crispin | 2024 Paris | 01:19:31 | |
| Lehnert Frédéric | 2018 Stuttgart | 01:20:21 | |
| Harrison Peter | 2024 Manchester | 01:20:24 | |
| Procida Mario | 2024 Rimini | 01:20:13 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 München | 01:25:36 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
