Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2019 Frankfurt using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Huser Marc's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Huser Marc's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Huser Marc's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Huser Marc's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 06:08. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sled Pull | 01:53 | 06:29 to 04:36 | 30.7% |
| Run Total | 01:20 | 42:49 to 41:29 | 21.7% |
| Wall Balls | 01:17 | 07:18 to 06:01 | 20.9% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:47 | 02:49 to 02:02 | 12.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:31 | 03:12 to 02:41 | 8.4% |
| Rowing | 00:15 | 04:58 to 04:43 | 4.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:05 | 04:27 to 04:22 | 1.4% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 03:15 to 03:15 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:19 to 04:19 | 0.0% |
| Huser Marc | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:46 | 00:00 | 04:35 +00:11 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:27 | 04:46 | 04:26 +00:01 | 04:35 +00:11 |
| Running 2 | 04:52 | 09:13 | 04:56 -00:04 | 09:01 +00:12 |
| Sled Push | 03:12 | 14:05 | 02:51 +00:21 | 13:57 +00:08 |
| Running 3 | 05:45 | 17:17 | 05:22 +00:23 | 16:48 +00:29 |
| Sled Pull | 06:29 | 23:02 | 04:53 +01:36 | 22:10 +00:52 |
| Running 4 | 05:41 | 29:31 | 05:20 +00:21 | 27:03 +02:28 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 03:15 | 35:12 | 05:17 -02:02 | 32:23 +02:49 |
| Running 5 | 05:35 | 38:27 | 05:31 +00:04 | 37:40 +00:47 |
| Rowing | 04:58 | 44:02 | 04:48 +00:10 | 43:11 +00:51 |
| Running 6 | 05:31 | 49:00 | 05:22 +00:09 | 47:59 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:49 | 54:31 | 02:10 +00:39 | 53:21 +01:10 |
| Running 7 | 05:16 | 57:20 | 05:21 -00:05 | 55:31 +01:49 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:19 | 01:02:36 | 05:03 -00:44 | 01:00:52 +01:44 |
| Running 8 | 05:27 | 01:06:55 | 05:57 -00:30 | 01:05:55 +01:00 |
| Wall Balls | 07:18 | 01:12:22 | 06:27 +00:51 | 01:11:52 +00:30 |
| Roxzone | 05:31 | 01:25:04 | 06:45 -01:14 | 01:25:04 |
His overall time of 01:25:04 was respectable, but there is room for improvement. His total running time of 00:42:49 was 01:20 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that Marc could benefit from improving his overall fitness and transition time during the roxzone.
Splits Analysis:
Analyzing Marc's splits, it is clear that there are certain segments where he lost more time compared to the average finisher. These segments include the Run Total, Sled Pull, Wall Balls, Farmers Carry, Best Lap, Running 1, Running 3, Running 4, and Rowing.
In conclusion, Marc Huser had a strong performance in the 2019 Frankfurt Hyrox race. However, there are areas where he can improve to enhance his overall performance. By focusing on specific training strategies and techniques, such as improving his overall fitness, strength, and endurance, Marc can work towards achieving better results in future races. Additionally, implementing race strategies such as proper pacing, efficient transitions, and mental preparation can also contribute to his success.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Cross Nick | 2024 Melbourne | 01:25:01 | |
| Doubrava David | 2024 Poznan | 01:25:25 | |
| Weeden Ed | 2024 London | 01:25:19 | |
| Mcnamara John | 2024 Hamburg | 01:25:10 | |
| Martin Stephen | 2024 Melbourne | 01:24:37 | |
| Schachenhofer Christian | 2018 Wien | 01:25:33 | |
| Blumenschein Andreas | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:25:29 | |
| Rapp Alexander | 2022 München | 01:24:42 | |
| Walenski Romain | 2024 Paris | 01:25:22 | |
| Ganzo Raul | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:24:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| No other results found for this athlete. | ||
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
