Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Hong Kong using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 177 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Ab Rahman Faliq's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Ab Rahman Faliq's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Ab Rahman Faliq's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Ab Rahman Faliq's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 16:13. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 15:01 | 01:12:22 to 57:21 | 92.6% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:48 | 03:59 to 03:11 | 4.9% |
| Ski Erg | 00:20 | 05:23 to 05:03 | 2.1% |
| Rowing | 00:04 | 05:40 to 05:36 | 0.4% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 02:54 to 02:54 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 05:19 to 05:19 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:18 to 06:18 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:55 to 04:55 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 10:18 to 10:18 | 0.0% |
| Ab Rahman Faliq | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:04 | 00:00 | 05:51 -00:47 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:23 | 05:04 | 05:01 +00:22 | 05:51 -00:47 |
| Running 2 | 07:58 | 10:27 | 06:44 +01:14 | 10:52 -00:25 |
| Sled Push | 02:54 | 18:25 | 04:07 -01:13 | 17:36 +00:49 |
| Running 3 | 09:38 | 21:19 | 07:54 +01:44 | 21:43 -00:24 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 30:57 | 07:25 -02:06 | 29:37 +01:20 |
| Running 4 | 09:50 | 36:16 | 07:51 +01:59 | 37:02 -00:46 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:18 | 46:06 | 09:04 -02:46 | 44:53 +01:13 |
| Running 5 | 10:28 | 52:24 | 08:41 +01:47 | 53:57 -01:33 |
| Rowing | 05:40 | 01:02:52 | 05:42 -00:02 | 01:02:38 +00:14 |
| Running 6 | 09:17 | 01:08:32 | 08:01 +01:16 | 01:08:20 +00:12 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:59 | 01:17:49 | 03:02 +00:57 | 01:16:21 +01:28 |
| Running 7 | 08:57 | 01:21:48 | 08:06 +00:51 | 01:19:23 +02:25 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:55 | 01:30:45 | 08:34 -03:39 | 01:27:29 +03:16 |
| Running 8 | 11:13 | 01:35:40 | 10:53 +00:20 | 01:36:03 -00:23 |
| Wall Balls | 10:18 | 01:46:53 | 11:05 -00:47 | 01:46:56 -00:03 |
| Roxzone | 12:36 | 02:09:41 | 11:40 +00:56 | 02:09:41 |
In terms of pacing, Faliq's splits analysis shows that he was faster than average in the first running segment (Running 1) and the Sled Push, but slower than average in the remaining running segments (Running 2, Running 3, Running 4, Running 5, Running 6, Running 7, Running 8). This indicates that he may have started the race too fast and should focus on maintaining a more consistent pace throughout.
Additionally, Faliq's total running time of 01:12:22 is 12:16 slower than average, suggesting that he could benefit from improving his running performance.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dyer Michael | 2023 Birmingham | 02:09:55 | |
| Rege Thomas | 2023 New York | 02:09:38 | |
| Fürst Marcel | 2019 Leipzig | 02:10:04 | |
| Adams Corey | 2022 Dallas | 02:09:21 | |
| Chung Wil | 2023 Birmingham | 02:09:36 | |
| Cyganek Daniel | 2022 Karlsruhe | 02:09:55 | |
| Van Helden Peter | 2024 Maastricht | 02:09:28 | |
| Dekker Raymond | 2023 Rotterdam | 02:09:40 | |
| Coombe David | 2022 Dallas | 02:09:22 | |
| Guerel Oezhan | 2023 Hamburg | 02:09:32 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Singapore | 03:21:49 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
