Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Rimini using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 727 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Garnham Zoe's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Garnham Zoe's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Garnham Zoe's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Garnham Zoe's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:29. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 03:58 | 55:14 to 51:16 | 88.5% |
| Sled Pull | 00:31 | 07:08 to 06:37 | 11.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 05:12 to 05:12 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 03:04 to 03:04 | 0.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:00 | 06:40 to 06:40 | 0.0% |
| Rowing | 00:00 | 05:09 to 05:09 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 02:21 to 02:21 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 04:44 to 04:44 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:41 to 04:41 | 0.0% |
| Garnham Zoe | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 06:16 | 00:00 | 05:36 +00:40 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 05:12 | 06:16 | 05:23 -00:11 | 05:36 +00:40 |
| Running 2 | 06:23 | 11:28 | 06:09 +00:14 | 10:59 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 03:04 | 17:51 | 03:06 -00:02 | 17:08 +00:43 |
| Running 3 | 06:52 | 20:55 | 06:33 +00:19 | 20:14 +00:41 |
| Sled Pull | 07:08 | 27:47 | 06:45 +00:23 | 26:47 +01:00 |
| Running 4 | 07:03 | 34:55 | 06:35 +00:28 | 33:32 +01:23 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 06:40 | 41:58 | 07:41 -01:01 | 40:07 +01:51 |
| Running 5 | 07:42 | 48:38 | 06:48 +00:54 | 47:48 +00:50 |
| Rowing | 05:09 | 56:20 | 05:42 -00:33 | 54:36 +01:44 |
| Running 6 | 06:39 | 01:01:29 | 06:41 -00:02 | 01:00:18 +01:11 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:21 | 01:08:08 | 02:33 -00:12 | 01:06:59 +01:09 |
| Running 7 | 06:41 | 01:10:29 | 06:40 +00:01 | 01:09:32 +00:57 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 04:44 | 01:17:10 | 05:51 -01:07 | 01:16:12 +00:58 |
| Running 8 | 07:41 | 01:21:54 | 07:32 +00:09 | 01:22:03 -00:09 |
| Wall Balls | 04:41 | 01:29:35 | 06:10 -01:29 | 01:29:35 +00:00 |
| Roxzone | 10:09 | 01:44:16 | 08:31 +01:38 | 01:44:16 |
In terms of her splits, Zoe had a best running lap of 00:06:16, which is a commendable time. However, she struggled in several running segments, including running 1, running 2, running 3, running 4, and running 5, where she lost time compared to the average. On the other hand, she performed exceptionally well in the ski erg, sled push, burpees broad jump, rowing, farmers carry, sandbag lunges, and wall balls segments, where she gained time compared to the average.
Overall, Zoe Garnham showed great potential in the 2023 Rimini HYROX race. By addressing the areas of improvement mentioned above and implementing the suggested training strategies and techniques, she can continue to enhance her performance and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Mckay Rebecca | 2024 Sydney | 01:44:17 | |
| Branahl Beatrix | 2022 Hamburg | 01:44:10 | |
| Christou Vanessa | 2024 Manchester | 01:44:22 | |
| Owen Siobháin | 2024 Dublin | 01:44:29 | |
| Hagy Laura | 2024 Stockholm | 01:44:07 | |
| Martín Medina Ana Belen | 2024 Madrid | 01:43:50 | |
| Letellier Alicia | 2024 Bordeaux | 01:44:45 | |
| Craggs Nicola | 2024 Paris | 01:44:13 | |
| Chong Xin Yu | 2024 Singapore National Stadium | 01:44:45 | |
| Ondarchie Jess | 2024 Melbourne | 01:44:19 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2021 Stuttgart | 01:41:59 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
