Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2024 Paris using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Gruley Mickael's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Gruley Mickael's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Gruley Mickael's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Gruley Mickael's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:37. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 02:43 | 41:01 to 38:18 | 58.8% |
| Sled Pull | 01:15 | 05:19 to 04:04 | 27.1% |
| Ski Erg | 00:19 | 04:32 to 04:13 | 6.9% |
| Sled Push | 00:16 | 02:38 to 02:22 | 5.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:02 | 04:16 to 04:14 | 0.7% |
| Rowing | 00:02 | 04:34 to 04:32 | 0.7% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:36 to 01:36 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:49 to 03:49 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 04:27 to 04:27 | 0.0% |
| Gruley Mickael | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:10 | 00:00 | 04:19 -00:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:32 | 04:10 | 04:20 +00:12 | 04:19 -00:09 |
| Running 2 | 05:00 | 08:42 | 04:38 +00:22 | 08:39 +00:03 |
| Sled Push | 02:38 | 13:42 | 02:40 -00:02 | 13:17 +00:25 |
| Running 3 | 05:35 | 16:20 | 05:00 +00:35 | 15:57 +00:23 |
| Sled Pull | 05:19 | 21:55 | 04:27 +00:52 | 20:57 +00:58 |
| Running 4 | 05:18 | 27:14 | 04:59 +00:19 | 25:24 +01:50 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:16 | 32:32 | 04:39 -00:23 | 30:23 +02:09 |
| Running 5 | 05:16 | 36:48 | 05:08 +00:08 | 35:02 +01:46 |
| Rowing | 04:34 | 42:04 | 04:39 -00:05 | 40:10 +01:54 |
| Running 6 | 05:00 | 46:38 | 05:01 -00:01 | 44:49 +01:49 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:36 | 51:38 | 02:01 -00:25 | 49:50 +01:48 |
| Running 7 | 05:13 | 53:14 | 05:00 +00:13 | 51:51 +01:23 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:49 | 58:27 | 04:35 -00:46 | 56:51 +01:36 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:02:16 | 05:27 +00:06 | 01:01:26 +00:50 |
| Wall Balls | 04:27 | 01:07:49 | 05:46 -01:19 | 01:06:53 +00:56 |
| Roxzone | 06:28 | 01:18:35 | 05:56 +00:32 | 01:18:35 |
Mickael Gruley put forth a determined effort in the 2024 Paris HYROX race. However, there is room for improvement in both his running and strength performance. Mickael's total running time was 01:14 slower than the average, indicating a need for enhancing his running speed and endurance. His performance in the initial segments from Running 1 to Running 4 shows that he started too fast, which might have affected his energy levels for the subsequent rounds. Further, his Roxzone time was slower than the average, indicating that he might have taken longer breaks or had slower transition times.
Going forward, Mickael should adopt a more strategic approach to his race pacing. Rather than starting out fast, he should aim to maintain a steady pace throughout the race, saving energy for the latter, more challenging segments. This can also help him reduce his Roxzone time, as he won't need as much recovery time between segments. Additionally, focusing on proper form during both the running and strength segments can not only improve his performance but also reduce the risk of injury.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Brook Keith | 2024 Manchester | 01:18:37 | |
| Harman Ben | 2023 London | 01:18:58 | |
| Ballegeer Shun | 2024 Rimini | 01:18:53 | |
| Rosborough Trevor | 2020 Chicago | 01:18:59 | |
| Owens Chris | 2024 Houston | 01:18:44 | |
| Tessarin Andrea Riccardo | 2023 London | 01:18:13 | |
| Anderson Murray | 2024 Glasgow | 01:18:15 | |
| Monahan Christopher | 2024 Dublin | 01:18:17 | |
| Dubois Marcel | 2024 Maastricht | 01:18:32 | |
| Van Der Made Ralph | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:18:17 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Paris | 01:34:01 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
