Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2022 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 96 similar athletes.
We stack your running times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you measure up. This chart breaks it down, showing whether you were blazing fast, cruising steady, or losing pace.
It’s all about finding out if your running strategy matched your overall finish time!
We pit your station times against athletes with similar finish times to see how you stack up. This chart shows if you crushed it, coasted, or found that sweet spot for your overall finish time.
Here’s the full breakdown of the race, station by station and run by run, stacked against the average of athletes with similar finish times.
In HYROX, pacing is the name of the game. The pacing line shows where you hit the gas, tapped the brakes, or nailed it perfectly—guiding the way to a more balanced and dominant race strategy.
With the RoxCoach Simulation machine, you can see how your predicted finish time evolves as you power through your race. This next-level tech recalculates your estimated finish time after every run and every station. Crushing the sled pull? Gaining ground on the row? Or holding strong in the Wall Balls? RoxCoach tracks it all, giving you the inside scoop on where you shined and where there’s room to level up.
This chart breaks down the splits for every athlete in the division, giving you a clear look at how times are distributed across the pack.
Compare performance to the competition, spotting where they dominated and where there’s room to improve.
You’ll see how they stack up against the Top 10%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and beyond. Outliers are out—so the focus stays on the real competition.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve his time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 29:04. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 25:56 (From 01:24:21 to 58:25) | 89.2% |
| Sled Pull | 02:03 (From 09:43 to 07:40) | 7.1% |
| Rowing | 00:57 (From 06:37 to 05:40) | 3.3% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:08 (From 03:23 to 03:15) | 0.5% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 (From 04:53 to 04:53) | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 (From 04:02 to 04:02) | 0.0% |
| BBJ | 00:00 (From 07:47 to 07:47) | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 (From 08:03 to 08:03) | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 (From 06:58 to 06:58) | 0.0% |
| Constant Love | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 07:34 | 00:00 | 06:22 +01:12 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:53 | 07:34 | 05:08 -00:15 | 06:22 +01:12 |
| Running 2 | 07:53 | 12:27 | 07:27 +00:26 | 11:30 +00:57 |
| Sled Push | 04:02 | 20:20 | 04:29 -00:27 | 18:57 +01:23 |
| Running 3 | 10:13 | 24:22 | 08:38 +01:35 | 23:26 +00:56 |
| Sled Pull | 09:43 | 34:35 | 08:23 +01:20 | 32:04 +02:31 |
| Running 4 | 10:29 | 44:18 | 08:29 +02:00 | 40:27 +03:51 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 07:47 | 54:47 | 09:47 -02:00 | 48:56 +05:51 |
| Running 5 | 10:52 | 01:02:34 | 09:36 +01:16 | 58:43 +03:51 |
| Rowing | 06:37 | 01:13:26 | 05:44 +00:53 | 01:08:19 +05:07 |
| Running 6 | 10:11 | 01:20:03 | 08:47 +01:24 | 01:14:03 +06:00 |
| Farmers Carry | 03:23 | 01:30:14 | 03:15 +00:08 | 01:22:50 +07:24 |
| Running 7 | 10:38 | 01:33:37 | 08:44 +01:54 | 01:26:05 +07:32 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:03 | 01:44:15 | 08:47 -00:44 | 01:34:49 +09:26 |
| Running 8 | 13:35 | 01:52:18 | 12:05 +01:30 | 01:43:36 +08:42 |
| Wall Balls | 06:58 | 02:05:53 | 12:42 -05:44 | 01:55:41 +10:12 |
| Roxzone | 08:11 | 02:20:54 | 12:31 -04:20 | 02:20:54 |
Love Constant's total running time was 01:24:21, which was 22:26 slower than the average for his finish time. This indicates that he may need to focus on improving his overall fitness and transition time in order to perform better in the roxzone. Additionally, his best running lap was 00:07:34, which was 01:32 slower than the average.
To improve the overall running performance, Love Constant should prioritize training for running. This can be achieved by incorporating specific running drills and exercises into his training routine. Some suggestions include interval training, hill sprints, tempo runs, and long-distance runs. By focusing on improving his running speed and endurance, Love Constant will be able to make up for the time lost in these segments.
For the segments where Love Constant performed below average, such as Running 7, Running 4, Running 8, and Running 3, he should work on improving his running technique and efficiency. This can be achieved through exercises that focus on running form, such as high knees, butt kicks, and strides. Additionally, incorporating strength training exercises that target the muscles used in running, such as lunges, squats, and calf raises, can help improve his running performance.
In the segments where Love Constant performed better than average, such as Sled Push, Sled Pull, and Burpees Broad Jump, he should continue to focus on maintaining and improving his strength and power. This can be achieved through exercises such as sled pushes and pulls, burpees, and broad jumps. By continuing to build strength and power, Love Constant will be able to perform well in these segments and potentially gain an advantage over his competitors.
Overall, Love Constant has shown potential in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his running performance and implementing strategic race strategies, he can continue to improve his performance and achieve better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Barborini Lucio | 2024 Milan | 02:20:31 | |
| Ahlers Lars | 2024 Hamburg | 02:21:20 | |
| Di Marino Lucas | 2024 Paris | 02:20:33 | |
| Timms Maurice | 2023 Melbourne | 02:21:15 | |
| Hofhauser Andreas | 2023 München | 02:20:45 | |
| Waugh Joe | 2022 Dallas | 02:20:46 | |
| Klein Obbink Patrick | 2024 Maastricht | 02:21:22 | |
| Leszinski César | 2024 Karlsruhe | 02:21:16 | |
| Serra Piero | 2024 Milan | 02:20:41 | |
| Rivault Florent | 2023 Madrid | 02:20:48 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Miami Constant Love | 02:28:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
Constant Love
