Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 727 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Cotter Sarah's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Cotter Sarah's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Cotter Sarah's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Cotter Sarah's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 07:11. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Run Total | 06:28 | 44:41 to 38:13 | 90.0% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:37 | 04:47 to 04:10 | 8.6% |
| Rowing | 00:06 | 04:57 to 04:51 | 1.4% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:23 to 04:23 | 0.0% |
| Sled Push | 00:00 | 01:55 to 01:55 | 0.0% |
| Sled Pull | 00:00 | 04:00 to 04:00 | 0.0% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:00 | 01:38 to 01:38 | 0.0% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:00 | 03:32 to 03:32 | 0.0% |
| Wall Balls | 00:00 | 02:53 to 02:53 | 0.0% |
| Cotter Sarah | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 05:22 | 00:00 | 04:27 +00:55 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:23 | 05:22 | 04:49 -00:26 | 04:27 +00:55 |
| Running 2 | 05:03 | 09:45 | 04:44 +00:19 | 09:16 +00:29 |
| Sled Push | 01:55 | 14:48 | 02:22 -00:27 | 14:00 +00:48 |
| Running 3 | 05:24 | 16:43 | 04:59 +00:25 | 16:22 +00:21 |
| Sled Pull | 04:00 | 22:07 | 04:42 -00:42 | 21:21 +00:46 |
| Running 4 | 06:06 | 26:07 | 04:59 +01:07 | 26:03 +00:04 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 04:47 | 32:13 | 04:44 +00:03 | 31:02 +01:11 |
| Running 5 | 05:55 | 37:00 | 05:05 +00:50 | 35:46 +01:14 |
| Rowing | 04:57 | 42:55 | 05:02 -00:05 | 40:51 +02:04 |
| Running 6 | 05:26 | 47:52 | 05:02 +00:24 | 45:53 +01:59 |
| Farmers Carry | 01:38 | 53:18 | 01:58 -00:20 | 50:55 +02:23 |
| Running 7 | 05:35 | 54:56 | 05:00 +00:35 | 52:53 +02:03 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 03:32 | 01:00:31 | 03:52 -00:20 | 57:53 +02:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:53 | 01:04:03 | 05:16 +00:37 | 01:01:45 +02:18 |
| Wall Balls | 02:53 | 01:09:56 | 03:54 -01:01 | 01:07:01 +02:55 |
| Roxzone | 03:31 | 01:16:12 | 05:17 -01:46 | 01:16:12 |
Sarah's total running time of 00:44:41 was 06:08 slower than the average for her finish time. This indicates that she may have spent more time resting or transitioning between exercise zones. To improve this segment, Sarah should focus on improving her overall fitness and reducing her transition time.
Additionally, Sarah's best running lap was 00:05:03, which suggests that she has a solid running ability. However, her splits for the individual running segments were slower than the average, indicating that she could benefit from more specific running training.
In summary, Sarah Cotter demonstrated an impressive performance in the 2023 New York Hyrox race. By focusing on improving her overall fitness, reducing transition times, and implementing specific training strategies, she can further enhance her performance and continue to excel in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ammendola Maria | 2022 Madrid | 01:16:26 | |
| Fleischhammer Natalie | 2024 Frankfurt | 01:16:31 | |
| De Brincat Abbygail | 2024 Marseille | 01:16:21 | |
| Neilson Grace | 2023 Glasgow | 01:16:00 | |
| Codina Villaró Jèssica | 2024 Bilbao | 01:16:38 | |
| Kroon Anja | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:16:00 | |
| Klemp Manon Aullen | 2024 Copenhagen | 01:16:38 | |
| Blömeke Janika | 2023 Hamburg | 01:15:45 | |
| Jopp Melanie | 2022 Karlsruhe | 01:15:54 | |
| Schwindack Lorena | 2024 Berlin | 01:16:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2023 Chicago | 01:09:59 | |
| 2024 New York | 01:23:20 | |
| 2024 Chicago Navy Pier | 01:20:27 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
