Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 New York using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Coker Shawn's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Coker Shawn's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Coker Shawn's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Coker Shawn's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 04:57. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wall Balls | 01:34 | 07:19 to 05:45 | 31.6% |
| Sled Pull | 01:07 | 05:33 to 04:26 | 22.6% |
| Sandbag Lunges | 00:50 | 05:27 to 04:37 | 16.8% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 00:46 | 05:29 to 04:43 | 15.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:21 | 02:19 to 01:58 | 7.1% |
| Sled Push | 00:15 | 02:50 to 02:35 | 5.1% |
| Rowing | 00:03 | 04:43 to 04:40 | 1.0% |
| Ski Erg | 00:01 | 04:20 to 04:19 | 0.3% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 40:27 to 40:27 | 0.0% |
| Coker Shawn | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 04:55 | 00:00 | 04:29 +00:26 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:20 | 04:55 | 04:24 -00:04 | 04:29 +00:26 |
| Running 2 | 04:57 | 09:15 | 04:52 +00:05 | 08:53 +00:22 |
| Sled Push | 02:50 | 14:12 | 02:50 +00:00 | 13:45 +00:27 |
| Running 3 | 05:02 | 17:02 | 05:15 -00:13 | 16:35 +00:27 |
| Sled Pull | 05:33 | 22:04 | 04:45 +00:48 | 21:50 +00:14 |
| Running 4 | 05:03 | 27:37 | 05:13 -00:10 | 26:35 +01:02 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 05:29 | 32:40 | 05:02 +00:27 | 31:48 +00:52 |
| Running 5 | 05:07 | 38:09 | 05:23 -00:16 | 36:50 +01:19 |
| Rowing | 04:43 | 43:16 | 04:45 -00:02 | 42:13 +01:03 |
| Running 6 | 04:57 | 47:59 | 05:15 -00:18 | 46:58 +01:01 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:19 | 52:56 | 02:07 +00:12 | 52:13 +00:43 |
| Running 7 | 04:57 | 55:15 | 05:14 -00:17 | 54:20 +00:55 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 05:27 | 01:00:12 | 04:53 +00:34 | 59:34 +00:38 |
| Running 8 | 05:33 | 01:05:39 | 05:45 -00:12 | 01:04:27 +01:12 |
| Wall Balls | 07:19 | 01:11:12 | 06:15 +01:04 | 01:10:12 +01:00 |
| Roxzone | 04:29 | 01:22:51 | 06:24 -01:55 | 01:22:51 |
In terms of specific splits, Shawn performed exceptionally well in the Ski Erg and Sled Push segments, finishing 4 seconds and 19 seconds faster than the average, respectively. He also had notable improvements in the Running 3 and Running 4 segments, finishing 13 seconds and 10 seconds faster than the average. However, there were several segments where Shawn lost significant time compared to the average, including the Burpees Broad Jump, Sled Pull, Wall Balls, and Sandbag Lunges.
Overall, Shawn Coker has shown great potential and skill in the Hyrox race. By focusing on improving his performance in the identified areas, implementing specific training strategies and techniques, and adopting effective race strategies, Shawn can continue to excel and achieve even better results in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Dudley Gordon | 2024 London | 01:22:27 | |
| Clark Laurence | 2023 London | 01:23:04 | |
| Van Tol Nils | 2024 Amsterdam | 01:23:19 | |
| Clark Rupert | 2024 Sports Direct HYROX London | 01:22:33 | |
| Probst Mathias | 2023 München | 01:22:57 | |
| Stelmachowski Leszek | 2023 London | 01:23:07 | |
| Briol Marc | 2024 Incheon | 01:22:52 | |
| Bradley James | 2024 Stockholm | 01:22:57 | |
| Marcou Sebastien | 2024 Stuttgart | 01:22:33 | |
| Monz Raphael | 2023 Frankfurt | 01:22:37 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Anaheim | 01:28:29 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
