Dive into this athlete’s performance at 2023 Glasgow using our in-depth report. By comparing their results to those of similar athletes, we identify key strengths and areas in need of improvement. For this specific race, our analysis is based on the performance of 1000 similar athletes.
We compare the athlete's running times with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly determine if your running pace was too fast or too slow for your overall finish time.
We compare the athlete's workout times for each station with peers who have similar finish times. This chart helps you quickly identify if any workouts were too fast or too slow relative to your overall finish time.
This section showcases the entire Barlow Luke's performance at each station and run segment compared to the average.
It reveals strengths and areas for improvement, providing insights into how the athlete's times stack up against typical HYROX competitors with same finish time.
In HYROX racing, pacing is crucial. The pacing line highlights Barlow Luke's pacing strategy, identifying segments where they may have started too fast or too slow, guiding them toward a more balanced race approach.
This chart illustrates the spread of splits of all athletes competing in the same division, providing a visual representation of the distribution of times for each split.
Use this chart to compare the Barlow Luke's performance against the competition, identifying areas of strength and those needing improvement.
This chart includes Top 10%, Top 25%, Top 50%, Top 75%, Top 90%, and Top 100% of the athletes. The outliers have been removed for clarity.
Based on our analysis, here are the focus areas for improvement. The goal is to determine how quickly the athlete could improve on some stations and where is the path of least resistance to improve Barlow Luke's time.
The percentile rank is the current position of the athlete compared to the competition. It goes from 0 to 100, where 0 is the best and 100 is the worst. It show the potential improvement for each station. The athlete should focus on the stations with the highest potential improvement and the biggest duration.
A big improvement in the Farmer's carry station will not be as impactful as a small improvement in the wall ball station for instance. Just click on a station to see how easy it will be to improve and how important it is to focus on it during training.
For this athlete we identified a possible improvement of 10:20. Check the detail of the improvement plan below.
| Splits | Potential Improvement | Time | Focus During Training |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sandbag Lunges | 02:57 | 08:25 to 05:28 | 28.5% |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 02:29 | 08:17 to 05:48 | 24.0% |
| Wall Balls | 01:48 | 08:46 to 06:58 | 17.4% |
| Sled Pull | 01:38 | 06:52 to 05:14 | 15.8% |
| Sled Push | 00:43 | 03:47 to 03:04 | 6.9% |
| Rowing | 00:34 | 05:30 to 04:56 | 5.5% |
| Farmers Carry | 00:11 | 02:28 to 02:17 | 1.8% |
| Ski Erg | 00:00 | 04:29 to 04:29 | 0.0% |
| Run Total | 00:00 | 39:47 to 39:47 | 0.0% |
| Barlow Luke | Perfect Race | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Splits | Total | Average | Total | |
| Running 1 | 03:42 | 00:00 | 04:51 -01:09 | 00:00 +00:00 |
| Ski Erg | 04:29 | 03:42 | 04:33 -00:04 | 04:51 -01:09 |
| Running 2 | 04:17 | 08:11 | 05:20 -01:03 | 09:24 -01:13 |
| Sled Push | 03:47 | 12:28 | 03:09 +00:38 | 14:44 -02:16 |
| Running 3 | 04:45 | 16:15 | 05:47 -01:02 | 17:53 -01:38 |
| Sled Pull | 06:52 | 21:00 | 05:26 +01:26 | 23:40 -02:40 |
| Running 4 | 05:01 | 27:52 | 05:48 -00:47 | 29:06 -01:14 |
| Burpees Broad Jump | 08:17 | 32:53 | 06:03 +02:14 | 34:54 -02:01 |
| Running 5 | 05:41 | 41:10 | 06:00 -00:19 | 40:57 +00:13 |
| Rowing | 05:30 | 46:51 | 04:58 +00:32 | 46:57 -00:06 |
| Running 6 | 04:32 | 52:21 | 05:50 -01:18 | 51:55 +00:26 |
| Farmers Carry | 02:28 | 56:53 | 02:21 +00:07 | 57:45 -00:52 |
| Running 7 | 04:23 | 59:21 | 05:48 -01:25 | 01:00:06 -00:45 |
| Sandbag Lunges | 08:25 | 01:03:44 | 05:40 +02:45 | 01:05:54 -02:10 |
| Running 8 | 07:30 | 01:12:09 | 06:37 +00:53 | 01:11:34 +00:35 |
| Wall Balls | 08:46 | 01:19:39 | 07:22 +01:24 | 01:18:11 +01:28 |
| Roxzone | 05:06 | 01:33:24 | 07:51 -02:45 | 01:33:24 |
In conclusion, Luke Barlow had a strong overall performance in the HYROX race in Glasgow. He showed a strong running profile and performed well compared to the average in most segments. However, there are areas that he can improve upon, such as sandbag lunges, burpees broad jump, wall balls, sled pull, running 8, and rowing. By implementing specific training strategies and techniques, including strength exercises, form corrections, and segment-specific strategies, Luke Barlow can enhance his performance in these areas and continue to improve in future races.
| Similar Athletes | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Galland Baptiste | 2024 Paris | 01:33:24 | |
| Henwood Phil | 2024 Singapore | 01:33:12 | |
| Rump Daniel | 2022 Bremen | 01:33:23 | |
| Burns Chris | 2023 Birmingham | 01:33:21 | |
| Gowans Alan | 2024 Glasgow | 01:32:57 | |
| Janes Steve | 2024 Dublin | 01:33:43 | |
| Brumfit Ben | 2023 London | 01:33:32 | |
| Perez Ramon | 2022 Los Angeles | 01:33:16 | |
| Bergen William | 2022 Amsterdam | 01:33:05 | |
| Dodson Chris | 2023 London | 01:33:29 | |
| Other Results from this athlete | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2024 Manchester | 01:17:00 | |
| 2023 Birmingham | 01:24:01 | |
| 2024 Birmingham | 01:20:20 | |
Unlock your potential with our pace calculator tool, designed to help you craft your ideal race splits and propel yourself to new heights.
Pace Calculator
